AppGuard Beta is Live (64 Bit, MemoryGuard)

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Eirik, Jul 7, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    I believe you can look at AG's logs to see what memory guard is blocking, and make the appropriate exceptions in AG's memory guard.
     
  2. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    It may be a little much, but I'm actually able to use the HIPS, and AG together now. I made a few exceptions in OA, and AG so they do not interfere with one another and they have been running great together for over a week now. They are on my 3 machines anyway. AG's memory guard is not blocking anything from OA since I made some memory guard exceptions for OA, and everything from AG is either set as an exception in OA or is configured as a trusted application. I had OA, and Prevx on those machines before. I replaced Prevx with AG, and they are actually running faster now than before.
     
  3. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    well I had OA and MD on my machines, and honestly if I never see a pop up again it won't be too soon.

    I just wanted a basic firewall, and then between Appguard and Sandboxie, I feel totally secure.
     
  4. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    Yes you can, but the thing I'm uncertain about is whether it's necessary to allow this for the proper functioning of certain security applications such as Sandboxie for example. Without a deep technical understanding of how these programs work, it seems to me that it's impossible for a normal user to make an assessment. I suppose that where a program that you trust is involved (e.g. Sandboxie), it's probably safer just to make the exceptions in case the code injection is necessary. Even then the exceptions operate in one direction only.

    What I've noticed in relation to Sandboxie, and other unguarded trusted applications that write to the memory of guarded applications (e.g. Firefox), is that in each and every case on my Windows XP Pro system, the guarded applications also attempt to write back to the memory space of the trusted application to establish a two-way communication between the memory spaces of the two processes.

    Due to the way MemoryGuard works in relation to guarded applications, the attempt to write back is blocked even though the trusted application's processes had been added to the exception list. Whether it is necessary to allow this two-way communication between the two memory spaces in specific cases is hard to say. If it is necessary in some cases, then the only viable options that I can see are: either to set the AppGuard protection level to High with MemoryGuard completely disabled OR set the protection level to medium and disable MemoryGuard selectively against specific guarded applications where necessary.

    The one anomaly that I've noticed - which I've already mentioned in a previous post - is Trusteer Rapport. Even though I added the two Rapport services to the MemoryGuard application exception list, the Rapport processes are still blocked by MemoryGuard from writing to the memory of all guarded applications, the most important of which in my case is Firefox as the whole point of Rapport is to protect the browser when not using Sandboxie. This looks like a bug in AppGuard as I would expect anything I add as an exception to be honoured.

    Given the large number of blocking messages that are being generated by guarded applications trying to write to the memory of various running processes, I've had to add every guarded application to the list of ignored messages in order to suppress the alerts and prevent large numbers of blocking events being recorded in the Windows application event log. I don't know whether other people are seeing this behaviour or whether this is specific to my system.
     
  5. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    OA has the best Tabbed UI in a firewall I have ever used. It has many options, and is extremely easy to use. If it did not have any HIPS at all it would still be my choice of Firewall. I would also feel perfectly safe running AG without OA's HIPS enabled. AG is one of the most effective products I have ever used, and I have tried just about everything at one time or another. The only thing I feel is as effective as AG is Shadow Defender which I will use until it is no longer supported by my OS.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2011
  6. 1000db

    1000db Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Posts:
    718
    Location:
    Missouri
    So far using the final release version I've had a lot of blocked events but no noticeable loss in functionality. I do a few online games and tons of browsing using Iron as my primary browser. One of my children, while playing an online game, had downloaded a fairly common trojan. Due to AG this file became benign even through my kids incessant clicking on everything. AG quietly stopped this in the background never allowing the file to execute or interfere with other processes. If I had any doubts about the efficacy of AG before they are gone now. I've also noticed no increased usage of resources compared to the last released version.
     
  7. buckslayr

    buckslayr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Posts:
    484
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    That's my setup. Windows firewall + AppGuard + ClearCloud DNS. Totally safe!
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    Only runing AppGuard here and very happy customer;)
     
  9. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    I have 2 P4 3.4 ghz machines that i'm going to go back to just using Window FW, AG, and NOD 32. I have OA installed on them at the moment without any conflicts, but I can tell a considerable slow down in performance. I may even give LnS FW another try.
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    AppGuard is on all my machines here but i think i may need a firewall to protect my outbound connection:thumb: other than that i am safe:thumb:
    i have appguard in medium security level
     
  11. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    That's the thing with me being reluctant to use Windows FW. I want good outbound protection, and Windows FW does not cut it. I'm already behind a gateway with IPS, DPI, and GAV. No need for any additional inbound protection. I might just try disabling OA's HIPS, and see if that does the trick to speed up system performance on my P4's. My other machines are ICore7's and I don't notice any slow down in them.
     
  12. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    Not making any recommendations here - just reporting my own experiences. I'm running Comodo Firewall v5.3 (just the firewall, not CIS) alongside AppGuard.

    Comodo Defense+ is configured purely as an anti-executable: Execution Control is enabled but all HIPS Monitoring and the Sandbox is disabled. The only alerts are when an unknown program tries to execute or gain outbound network access, or when any program attempts to execute another which compensates for the lack of parent/child network access control in the firewall.

    AppGuard protection level is set to high on my system but I have created some ignored message exclusions for each guarded application in order to reduce the number of MemoryGuard blocking message alerts recorded in the Windows Event Log.

    Even with AppGuard protection level set to high, AppGuard and Comodo Firewall are running well together on my system with no conflicts or slowdowns.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2011
  13. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I turned off OA's HIPS and leaktest from GRC goes thru OA like a knife through soft butter. So what? For the firewall to "leak" something you don't want to run needs to run. Appguard alone would stop that, and Sandboxie further aids in that.

    I have, and have always tested with leaktest on my desktop. Now it won't run, so it can't leak.

    Pete
     
  14. Greg S

    Greg S Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,039
    Location:
    A l a b a m a
    Is there a way to stop AG from continuously populating the Event Viewer with certain events?

    The ones in the picture are for Windows Media Player. I've tried every combination of checks with no joy.

    Untitled.png
     
  15. Brocke

    Brocke Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    USA,IA
    Is it good to have AG in quiet mode?

    also when will AG have program updating or does it have a popup message saying about a newer version?
     
  16. Brocke

    Brocke Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    USA,IA
    is there a place where you clear the Events screen in AG?
     
  17. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    in high security level even better:thumb:
     
  18. Dave53

    Dave53 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Posts:
    123
    Check out the Ignore Messages Dialog section in the AG Help document. One of the options when you add an item to ignored messages is to disable event log. Perhaps that would help. I'm going to experiment with this.

    Dave
     
  19. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    Just right-click on the Events screen and select Clear All.
     
  20. Greg S

    Greg S Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,039
    Location:
    A l a b a m a
    Let me know how it goes. I've tried what I consider everything but with no joy.
     
  21. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    I found that every guarded application tries to write to the memory of other running processes which causes a fair number of MemoryGuard blocking messages to be generated. To reduce the number of events logged, I added an ignore message for each guarded application of the following form: -

    Prevented <guarded application> from writing to memory of <*>​

    making sure that the Disable Event Log checkbox is checked (and optionally the Disable Status Display and Apply for All Users checkboxes as well).

    So far, MemoryGuard blocking of guarded applications writing to the memory of other processes doesn't seem to have adversely impacted anything on my system, at least as far as I can tell.
     
  22. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    These are my sentiments too. I'm much more concerned to deny the unknown in the first place than to monitor what is happening once the unknown is running. For me, AppGuard and Sandboxie make a good strong combination with no popups. :)
     
  23. Greg S

    Greg S Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,039
    Location:
    A l a b a m a
    Just now tried this. Thought for a few minutes that it was working but the Event Viewer is filling up again. Can you show a screenshot for one of your <*> rules?
     
  24. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    Here is the one for Firefox: -

    Ignored Messages.JPG
     
  25. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    I just thought I'd check something and it looks like AppGuard may be ignoring the setting to disable writing to the event log.

    Here is the corresponding entry for Firefox in the customisation screen for the screenshot of the <*> rule I just posted: -

    AppGuard Customise.JPG

    and here is a screenshot of an event that was recorded in the Windows Event Log a short while ago: -

    AppGuard Event.JPG

    Looks like event 1074003976 for Firefox is still getting written to the Windows Event Log even though I created a <*> rule to disable this event, or maybe I'm misunderstanding something here. :doubt:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.