AppGuard 3.x 32/64 Bit

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by shadek, Mar 12, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Thanks for the link. I'm requesting that the test department try to recreate. BTW, the blocking message that you are receiving from AppGuard is after the crash. AppGuard is preventing the OS from doing the crash analysis. That doesn't mean that AppGuard is not intefering as your testing seems to clearly indicate, and we'll get to the bottom of it in our lab.
     
  2. stackz

    stackz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    Thanks for the response :)

    I'm currently running AppGuard on high. Running it at medium or even install level makes no difference to the audio problem for x64 WMP, though the x64 version of IE gets audio at install level. Nothing is logged as blocked for any application.

    Will the number of exception folders be increased in the future, as I prefer to use this for exception files where possible, rather than excluding entire directories?
     
  3. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,854
    Lots of blocked stuff when trying to play Battlefield 3, which I expected. I will post a log but it's easier for me to just turn AG off to play.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. enemyofarsenic

    enemyofarsenic Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Posts:
    85
    Is appguard license lifetime?
     
  5. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    Yes it is :thumb:
     
  6. enemyofarsenic

    enemyofarsenic Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Posts:
    85
    free updates for 1 year or lifetime like mbam?
     
  7. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    2,180
    Location:
    Canada
    See answer on post #618 from Barb C
     
  8. Doraemon

    Doraemon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    202
    So NOT LIFETIME then... I think people understand "lifetime" as free UPGRADES forever. To be able to use the bought version forever shouldn't be called "LIFETIME" as it's misleading IMHO.

    :-*
     
  9. Greg S

    Greg S Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,039
    Location:
    A l a b a m a
    Anyone know why after getting this alert that Windows Live Mail will not receive new mail? I notice it stops receiving becasue I go to the GMail site and there sits my mail. I go back to WLM, select to receive mail for the default account and get the WLM connection error dialog. I can then select to Sync once again and it retrieves the mail.

    Code:
    10/30/11 12:33:38 Prevented <Host Process for Windows Services> from writing to <\registry\machine\system\controlset001\services\tcpip\parameters\interfaces\{d3f71a05-f3ae-45b5-a436-fc9398174ae3}>.
    
    
    10/30/11 12:33:38 Prevented <Host Process for Windows Services> from writing to <\registry\machine\system\controlset001\services\netbt\parameters>.
    
     
  10. chris1341

    chris1341 Guest

    I wonder if Barb C or anyone from BRN would give their view on the issue with Sandboxie and AppGuard at lock down on 64 bit systems referenced near the end of this thread:

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=310812

    and also here on the Sandboxie forum

    http://www.sandboxie.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=11781

    I asked Ilya years ago about adding exceptions to the Defensewall logic to allow processes that would always run trusted even if spawned from an untrusted process (oddly enough to make it work better with Sandboxie) and he understandibly declined. I'm assuming BRN will also baulk at the suggestion of allowing ungaurded user space launches at lock down but confirmation would be helpful.

    Thanks
     
  11. Dave53

    Dave53 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Posts:
    123
    You do have to wonder though why AppGuard would allow this process in 32-bit and not in 64-bit.

    Along this line, I would like to know if there is any significant difference in the level of protection in 32-bit vs 64-bit. As we know, many security programs are hindered by PatchGuard in Win 7x64. I am curious if this is an issue for AppGuard as well. In the case above, it appears that, to the contrary, the 64-bit version is blocking something that the 32-bit version does not. o_O
     
  12. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    There are no significant differences in protection with 32bit, and 64bit that i know of. You are locked down tight on both, and there is very little chance of anything getting through. In my experience AG is much more effective than any AV or any similar product.
     
  13. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    What kind of exclusion do I need to set with AG to exclude an entire folder under the programs directory? I want to exclude the Online Armor folder under C:/ programs. The folder has so many components that I would be better off excluding the entire folder. I already have 6 exclusions in memory guard for OA.
     
  14. kjdemuth

    kjdemuth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    2,974
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Anyone having any issues with chrome not running properly even under a guarded app? I still get an error on chrome when on set on high. Also what should I be setting adobe reader on as a guarded app? For some reason when adobe tries to run it freezes the browser.
     
  15. Dave53

    Dave53 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Posts:
    123
    I think that this can be accomplished by going to the Guarded Apps tab and clicking the Settings button under folders. You can add the folder and set the type to read/write. Maybe others can confirm if this correct.

    Dave
     
  16. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks Dave53! I believe that may be just what I was looking for. I do have a question though to the development team. If I set this exception for the Online Armor C:/ programs folder under guarded App, and allow read, write, and installation does this mean that it is allowing read / write to the disk only or does this allow read / write to the memory as well? I already had exception allowing several modules of OA to read, and write to the memory under memory guard exceptions. Do I still need these exceptions now that I have excluded the entire folder under guarded Apps? Below is a screenshot of the exception I defined for OA so AG would not block OA from updating.
     

    Attached Files:

  17. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    We'll look at increasing this in the next release. We can probably go to 32 or 64 without too much of a performance hit. Do you think that is adequate?
     
  18. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    There's no way that I know of to do this in the current version. Sounds like a future enhancment to me.
     
  19. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    This will allow Guarded applications to write to this particular folder, but it will not add the applications within the folder to the MemoryGuard Exception list (that is what I thought the original post was requesting).
     
  20. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    This will allow OA to update, but it will not allow the applications within the folder to be exempt from MemoryGuard. Excluding this folder will allow any Guarded application to write to this folder, so it may be opening up a security hole.
     
  21. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    We do have the concept of Power Applications in our enterprise version of AppGuard. Power Apps are immune from AppGuard protection whether launched from a guarded application or directly. We'll consider exposing this feature in the future for the consumer version, but we are really trying to keep the consumer version as simple as possible.
     
  22. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Will you send the details (OS, events reported, behavior, versions of software affected, etc.) to AppGuard@BlueRidgeNetworks.com? Thanks!
     
  23. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Personally I don't see any need to exclude OA's folder. I justed added all OA's (and SBIE as well) to the memguard exclusion, and end of any problems.

    Pete
     
  24. Greg S

    Greg S Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Posts:
    1,039
    Location:
    A l a b a m a
    Is memory guard exclusions honored in Locked Down Protection Level?
     
  25. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I assume so, but not totally sure. Blueridge??
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.