Antivirus product self-protection test by Anti-Malware Test Lab

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by IlyaOS, Sep 20, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    I didn't miss anything at all; in fact I quoted your quoted text above. ;) If you cannot see how you're making excuses then I am not about to go off topic in this thread and point out the obvious. I'm surprised nobody has cried viral marketing yet.
     
  2. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    im not making excuses, its poor and i did expect drweb to fail this test.

    i just think drweb are putting too much into V5 ,instead of spreading out the features.

    unified control centre
    http scanner
    HIPS
    self protection
    etc etc

    i just think, they could have put more into 4.44 maybe.

    its not making excuses, i think drweb performed poorly in this test, just stating the obvious.

    ~Personal comments removed.~

    :D

    lol

    tooda-loo
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 3, 2007
  3. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Romania
    FYI

    http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=49397
     
  4. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    there will always be something available to get past an antivirus, or to shut it down completely, what really matters is the response and actions from the antivirus company itself.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.