antivirus companies stick to antivirus?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by lodore, Oct 13, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007
    Hi, I was wondering what you thought on this topic.

    should nod32, kaspersky, antivir and all the other main av's stick to anti virus and
    leave firewalls to e.g. outpost look n stop kerio etc? and same for anti spam?


    lodore
     
  2. ThunderZ

    ThunderZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,459
    Location:
    North central Ohio, U.S.A.

    In my most humble of opinions AVs should stick with AVs and FWs should stick with FWs. However as long as Nod continues to offer a stand alone AV I will continue to use it. Where as ZA continues to bloat its programs, regardless of the vers. Whether it ZA\ZA Pro\ZASS. The more I play with and hear about Comodo, the more I think about making the jump to it on my personal machine.and I still have 207 days left on this lic.:eek:
     
  3. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007

    Thanks for your opinion on the topic.
    I might get nod32 or antivir premium but i might decide to get just the av and use e.g. comodo firewall aka best of all worlds. better than being jack of all trades master of none :)
    better to have a specialist area.
     
  4. ThunderZ

    ThunderZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,459
    Location:
    North central Ohio, U.S.A.

    Perhaps I should`t be so quick to "judge" the possible FW by Nod. I have just never seen a be all\end all\do it all suite. Much as you said, I will stick with what I feel to be the best from all security categories to meet both mine and my machines needs.
     
  5. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    although AV companies dont make the best firewalls and vice versa, i do like having choices.

    if i were to ever ditch outpost, i could very well use KIS. they have similarities, which makes switching easy. likewise when eset releases their suite, i could use that instead of KAV + Outpost.
     
  6. ThunderZ

    ThunderZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,459
    Location:
    North central Ohio, U.S.A.

    Choice = competition. That is good for us the EU. But only if we do our homework, read and learn about the options, products and are aware of the threats we face. As long as we do not just buy into the hype that a lot of companies use. IMO, many of the top selling security products are only that because of the advertising $$$$ they spend.
     
  7. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    No i think its good that many companies are offering all-in-one suites. It makes security easier to manage and prevents any problems that often happen between conflicting programs.
     
  8. mercurie

    mercurie A Friendly Creature

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Posts:
    2,442
    Location:
    Sky over the Wilders Forest
    Suites have their place (especially when money is an issue), but yes, I think what you are saying is best! ;)
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2006
  9. Atomic_Ed

    Atomic_Ed Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    389
    IMO I think it is most likely better for a vendor to specialize in one security product or another, such as just AV, firewall, etc. However in recent years with the Internet becoming more and more of a security risk. People are looking at needing multiple types of security applications as opposed to just an AV as was the case in the past. When you think about the average person who just wants to have some security for their computer and that they don't want to learn how to find which of each product to get and configure to work properly, then the suite idea does make sense. When you add to this that each indivdual product needs to sell for a fair price to cover development, updates and some profit for the comany making it, then needing to purchase multiple applications individually even for a modest price each, can get pretty expensive for most people.

    So all in all I think individual products will almost always be better, but I don't know that the market will bear it.
     
  10. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Yes and No.

    Kaspersky's first version of AntiHacker was a little rough.ArcaBit's home-grown firewall was rougher yet.
    AV companies earn their reputation/name recognition from their AV programs.
    If they can develop an excellent firewall.Great! That's another option to consider. Competition and choice are a good thing.

    Personally,I'd rather stay with individual programs to cover my computer's security.Why accept a weak component of a suite?
    That could change if someone comes out with a fantastic suite.
     
  11. btman

    btman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Posts:
    576
    As i have learned on the anti-virus forums, although Kaspersky does not have an anti-spyware scanner, spyware, adware, trojans, viruses or ANY malware is in the signatures put in a normal Kaspersky virus scan.
     
  12. QBgreen

    QBgreen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Posts:
    627
    Location:
    Queens County, NY
    Nothing wrong with specialization, IMHO. Aside from Dr. Web, I'm hard pressed to think of a popular anti-virus author that isn't planning on releasing a type of security suite if they haven't already.
     
  13. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007
    i agree but most av's companies are still doing the av on its own.
     
  14. marcromero

    marcromero Guest

    But where is their main focus, the av or the suite ? I think when they start expanding their offerings they may tend to start loosing their main focus, time will tell if the performance of their av product starts to suffer, lets hope not.
     
  15. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007

    I agree and thats why I started this thread. to be honest I dont think kaspersky has lost its focus thou.

    lodore
     
  16. Mele20

    Mele20 Former Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Posts:
    2,495
    Location:
    Hilo, Hawaii
    I beta tested KIS 2006 for about a year. What did I choose when KAV and KIS 2006 became officially available? KAV. I don't need a firewall. I don't need a spam blocker. I don't need a web scanner. I don't need an email scanner. I can do without a real time AV also. What is absolutely necessary is a command line scanner. The rest is frills. I do like KAV's PAD though as it complements PG. But I did not install antispam or email scanner or web scanner. I have only file antivirus and PAD and that is plenty! So, not only do I not like Suites, I don't even like AVs that include things like email scanners and web scanners.
     
  17. Big Apple

    Big Apple Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Posts:
    724
    I would just wait for the final release of the Antivir Suite......runs just great and no hard or hazy configurations at all!
     
  18. marcromero

    marcromero Guest

    I agree, Kav av is still tops in detection, but people still seem to be having issues with other add ons in the product, especially the suite.
     
  19. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    "antivirus companies stick to antivirus?"

    --I guess so, I don't think they're going to make shampoo or cornflakes anytime soon... :D
     
  20. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007
    IMO. I like web scanners, it means a virus or Trojan wont hit your hard drive.

    i will probaly get eiether kav or kis. i could get kav and use comodo

    lodore
     
  21. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    In my opinion there are two answers on your question (of course in my first reply I was joking around).

    1) If you talk about webscanners, sandboxes and behaviour control I'l rather call that the evaluation of anti-virus programs to protect you against the latest (and more advanced) malware.

    2) When you talk about firewalls and anti-spam I think we should leave that up to separate company's. However some big company's just have a couple 'divisions' of programmers, if that is the case I wouldn't mind. At the end of the day the main question is if the company has enough man power to keep all products in good shape.
     
  22. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    And thats mostly all that matters. When the company runs fine and has enough resources to develop and support all product lines, there is no problem anywhere. :)
     
  23. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    These AV's has to make suite's, because the majority of users want "All-in one-programs", if they don't they will loose customers simple as that and in case we haven't seen it, most of the firewall's are moving in the same direction and are almost suites themselves this will increase because the consumer wants their suites to do everything including the laundry! (ok ok, slight exaggeration :D). I think we have only seen the beginning infact.

    The important thing in my mind is that they make it possible for users to select exactly what modules they want to use during the install process.:)
     
  24. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,007
    I agree Don and like the fact you can deselect what you dont want in kav and kis.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.