Anti-malware.ru: Test firewalls to protect against internal attacks (July 2013)

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by a256886572008, Jul 7, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. a256886572008

    a256886572008 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2007
    Posts:
    103
  2. siketa

    siketa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2012
    Posts:
    2,695
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Great job, Comodo! :thumb:
     
  3. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    340
    Norton did a pretty good job considering some other firewall tests ranked it fairly low! I know a few of their security settings don't work because I use Windows 8 and I have a 64 bit computer. So I assume it would be under the standard option settingso_O
     
  4. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    I assume the NIS 2013 Max rating means running with Automatic Program Control set to off. The average user would never be able to handle that setting since they will get alerts for everything. And yes under x64, NIS 2013 has signifigantly less protection; no keylogging, dll injection. etc.

    Actually I don't consider the Windows firewall ranking that bad considering it is only providing inbound protection by default. I don't understand their max rating for it however. I guess they didn't set outbound protection on for it? Or perhaps they didn't realize no alerts will be generated but everything outbound without a rule will be silently blocked?
     
  5. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,833
    I've come expect that Comodo will do well, so good for them :thumb: But i'm surprised about BitDefender also getting 100% :eek: I didn't realise it was that good :thumb:

    I don't see ZA in there ?
     
  6. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    2,509
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Such a shame, that they have not included Privatefirewall, it was always my favorite and I am sure, that it would score great.
     
  7. MyBlackBox

    MyBlackBox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Posts:
    35
    Location:
    Italy
    Was going to tell the same, it should be with the gold prized ones...
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2013
  8. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    3,767
    Location:
    Outer space
    Wow, Bitdefender surprises me, 100% on max settings even, let alone 100% on default settings. I know it has some HIPS component, but I thought it was quite simple/basic and turned off by default for the average user?

    They should have included Privatefirewall and SpyShelter firewall as well. Also, a reaction to the test by Ilya Rabinovich, but Defensewall Firewall is not tested, pity.
     
  9. ZeroDay

    ZeroDay Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Posts:
    693
    Location:
    Hogwarts.
    Yeah I was shocked with the Bitdefender results too.
     
  10. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Note that is test was for WIN 7 x86. They stated they will hopefully do a x64 test later this year. Can't wait to see how NIS 2013 fares on that test.
     
  11. FOXP2

    FOXP2 Guest

    :thumb: :thumb: Online Armor :thumb: :thumb:
    That 90% level is provided by OA Free's "Standard Mode" as well.
     
  12. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,849
    Which score would OA free have got? Still good regardless.

    And kind of funny Norton and OA did BETTER on the higher complexity ones, when every other one did worse.
     
  13. lordraiden

    lordraiden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Posts:
    3,072
    Probably the same OA HIPS is the same in the free than in the paid version.
     
  14. FleischmannTV

    FleischmannTV Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    1,071
    Location:
    Germany
    Does anyone of you know, if it's still possible to configure Kaspersky IS 2014 in the same way they did in this test, in spite of the GUI and configurability changes?
     
  15. Jarmo P

    Jarmo P Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Posts:
    1,186
    Seems Zonealarm was left out from that russkie test.
     
  16. Disney

    Disney Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Posts:
    103
    Location:
    USA
    Comodo I get . I would like to know more about this test because I have a hard time believing Outpost basically sucks compared to top tier .It could be right as Outpost has different versions and I have ALWAYS found newer version are terrible to start . This is the only thing I can figure .
     
  17. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    First, this is a leak test. Notice the title "Protecting Against Internal Threats."

    As such, it is usefull for calculating a delta between out-of-box and maximum firewall settings. I didn't see any that showed more than a 10% deviation in protection. Many were far less than that. The report if test methodolgy was of substance indicates firewall "tweaking" might be of questionable effort. The most signfigant improvement would be the NIS firewall which I believe is somewhat common knowledge. Also signifigant in my opinion is that the WIN 7firewall which allows all outbound still scored high enough to get a bronze award.

    -EDIT-
    There is one eye opener in this test. Both Kapersky and BitDefender with out-of-box settings do not provide much more leak protection than the WIN 7 firewall. In other words, they are allowing all outbound connections. This syncs with with my experience with KIS 2013 when I ran it for a brief time. Also neither of these firewalls are easy to configure since the rules are fairly cryptic.

    Looks to me the big winners of this testing are Comodo and Online Armor. No surprise there.
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2013
  18. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Thanks for the update. Seems like i dont check the FW Forum enough, i always miss these threads.
     
  19. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,010
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Since F-Secure uses the Windows firewall supplemented by DeepGuard, preventing suspicious applications from accessing the Internet, how is Microsoft scoring higher than F-Secure!:blink: :p
     
  20. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Maybe they turned off the Windows firewall perhaps in error? You never know what these independant tests are really about. Note that F-Secure scored about the same on the last Matousec x64 test.
     
  21. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.