Anti-Malware.ru: Personal & Corporate Antivirus Performance Tests

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Sergey Ilyin, Mar 30, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Hi everyone! I would like to share our latest test results with you.

    1. Personal antivirus performance test (February 2011)
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/antivirus_test_performance_2012

    Antivirus suites that were tested:
    Avast Internet Security 6 (версия 6.0.1367)
    AVG Internet Security 2012 (версия 2012.0.1873)
    Avira Premium SecuritySuite2012(версия 12.0.0.832)
    BitDefender Internet Security 2012 (версия 15.0.33.1409)
    Comodo Internet Security 2012 (версия 5.8.213334.2131)
    Dr.Web Security Space 7 (версия 7.0.0.10140)
    Eset Smart Security 5.0 (версия 5.0.94.:cool:
    F-Secure Internet Security 2012 (версия 1.44)
    G DATA Internet Security 2012 (версия 22.0.9.1)
    Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 (версия 12.0.0.374)
    McAfee Internet Security 2012 (версия 11.0.623)
    Microsoft Security Essentials 2.1 (версия 2.1.1116.0)
    Norton Internet Security 2012 (версия 19.2.0.10)
    Outpost Security Suite Pro 7.5.1 (версия 3791.596.1681)
    Panda Internet Security 2012 (версия 17.01.00)
    Trend Micro Titanium Internet Security 2012 (версия 5.0.1280)


    Summary

    Operation system boot time slowdown
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/images/test/performance_2012/01.png

    Files copying slowdown % (on-access antivirus scanner performance testing)
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/images/test/performance_2012/05.png

    Files collection scanning time
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/images/test/performance_2012/06.png


    ************************************


    2. Corporate antivirus performance test (March 2011)
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/Corporate_antivirus_test_performance_2012

    Antivirus that were tested:
    AVG Internet Security Business Edition 2012
    Dr.Web Enterprise Suite 6.0
    ESET Smart Security 4.2 Business Edition
    Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.1
    McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.8
    Sophos Endpoint Security and Control 9.7
    Symantec Endpoint Protection 12
    Trend Micro Enterprise Security for Endpoints 10.6

    Operation system boot time slowdown
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/files/adm/test28_12_1.png

    Files copying slowdown % (on-access antivirus scanner performance testing)
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/files/adm/test28_12_4_1.png

    Files collection scanning time
    http://www.anti-malware.ru/files/adm/test28_12_6.png


    P.S. They haven't been translated to English yet because of we are changing engine & design on our english website.
     
  2. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    Gdata having low boot time :O
     
  3. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Nevis, why not? :)
     
  4. 1000db

    1000db Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Posts:
    718
    Location:
    Missouri
    I can't speak about the rest of the programs but I've been using Dr Web SS 7 for a couple months now and the test results reflect my experience with this product. For me on-access performance is far more important than on-demand and DrWSS does really well at this.
     
  5. SnowFlakes

    SnowFlakes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Posts:
    194
    sorry to say but i don't belive in russian AV-test
     
  6. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    *
    You have the right but I believe in real independent test (free of charge for participants). This is the huge difference of Anti-Malware.ru tests.

    *
    Anyway our methodology is open and available in English
    http://www.anti-malware-test.com/?q=node/170
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2012
  7. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    Actually, I agree with overall trend of graph but Gdata was not fast than others as depicted.
    Overall, my findings are in sync with your data ( for boot time)
     
  8. Cudni

    Cudni Global Moderator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    6,956
    Location:
    Somethingshire
    ot posts removed
     
  9. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    4,049
    Location:
    USA
  10. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    From one drive to other one (WDC WD2500JS-22NCB1 and WDC WD2500JS-22NCB1). It would be a little bit incorrect coping files within one drive.
     
  11. stratoc

    stratoc Guest

    I have 4 years license for dr web, I like the program, I also have licenses for eset, avast and norton.
    As for performance there must be something wrong with my pc's or the tables are upsidedown maybe :D
    Just noticed.... Avast 4.8?
     
  12. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    No, we tested Avast Internet Security 6 (6.0.1367) as noticed in the first post ;)
     
  13. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,915
    Hi!

    The test is not actual from the day of its release because an old verison of Comodo is tested.

    There exists CIS 5.10 now and CIS 5.8 was tested.

    :thumbd:
     
  14. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Hi Solarlynx!

    You can declare the same about every comparative test. It takes time when any participant AV will be updated (minor versions, builds, CFs etc.).

    Just try to explain why CIS 5.10 should be faster o_O
     
  15. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,915
    I don't use CIS 5.10 but some who use it - at the Comodo's forum - says that it is significantly faster then previous versions.

    I use CIS 5.9 and it is really quicker and smarter than 5.8 - scanning takes considerably less time. This is not as you write 'minor versions, builds, CFs etc.'

    Another issue is that the 5.9 was released long ago before the Anti-Malware test was published. Do you deliberately take older versions of less favorable products to increase odds of other progs? Then the test is biased and unreliable.

    :thumbd:
     
  16. Sergey Ilyin

    Sergey Ilyin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    We started this test in Dec. 2011, so the CIS 5.8 was actual on that time.

    If Comodo wants we can check the new version 5.10 and compare it with other results.
     
  17. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,915
    Started in December and finished in March?
    at a snail's pace...
    In 4 months all products may have changed significantly.

    I don't know if Comodo wants it. But as for Comodo users they would definitely be grateful to get tests of actual version.
    And why not to post the tests in English as well?

    Thank you
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.