alternatives to process guard?

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by chrome_sturmen, Jun 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. chrome_sturmen

    chrome_sturmen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Posts:
    785
    Location:
    Sverige
    well, about my post further down on this page, i found that it was process guard that was preventing my screensaver and screensaver launcher from working correctly( yes all permissions were set right)

    maybe there is an alternative to process guard?
     
  2. dog

    dog Guest

    As your post isn't a PG support question I moved it to the Other Security Issues Forum - The thread you are referring to above is this one.

    There are a few alternatives to PG ... AppDefend and SSM would be the other popular ones. ;)
     
  3. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    antihook is another alternative, tho i havent heard much about it lately.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2006
  4. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    17,046
    Also Online Armor and Prevx1
     
  5. Stem

    Stem Firewall Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    UK
    I am currenty using SSM with no problems. it is currently being updated every few weeks (also a 60 days trial).

    I have no issues with the others mentioned.
    You should download/test, to see which one works best for you and your system.
     
  6. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,047
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
    Hi, SSM or OA.
     
  7. chrome_sturmen

    chrome_sturmen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Posts:
    785
    Location:
    Sverige
    i think i was wrong about process guard interfering with my screensaver, because its been uninstalled for a day now, and it seems that the problem is still occuring-unless it makes some kinda permanent changes- hm, i guess i was wrong
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.