Advertising is a cancer on society

Discussion in 'privacy problems' started by Yuki2718, Sep 30, 2019.

  1. Yuki2718

    Yuki2718 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Posts:
    1,757
    http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html
     
  2. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    8,928
    Interesting.

    As I see it, advertising = propaganda.
     
  3. Yuki2718

    Yuki2718 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Posts:
    1,757
    :thumb:
     
  4. KeyPer4Life

    KeyPer4Life Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Posts:
    1,171
    According to Statista in 2018 Google's ad revenue amounted to almost 116.3 billion US dollars.
    Advertising accounted for the majority of Google’s total revenue, which amounted to a total
    of 136.2 billion U.S. dollars.

    In the most recent fiscal period, advertising revenue through Google Sites made up 70.9%
    of the company's revenues.
     
  5. Reality

    Reality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Posts:
    1,145
    What is staggering is people as a whole have not cottoned on to the malignancy and mind games inherent in advertising ages ago, but for sure it's worse now. For one thing just the way they shove ads down your throat makes it one of the most annoying things imaginable let alone all the other devious tricks they try and pull. Just like robocalls and other unsolicited nuisances I hate ads and have become resistant to them so pushing them at me is a waste of time.
     
  6. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    8,928
    I don't answer the phone anymore, unless the number is in the system, and recognized. Otherwise, they can leave messages. Spam callers rarely do.
     
  7. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Posts:
    993
    Advertising is utterly deadly. It makes YOU believe you need to do things like smoking, overeating, and trusting your car to bail you out via emergency stops and pedestrian avoidance. Let alone cars being advertised as partly self-driving with lane keeping and remote summoning and other such safety/convenience features" THAT DO NOT WORK in the worst situations - when you would need them the most. And AAA agrees with me 101%.

    From a technical standpoint, we are about 2-5% of the way there when it comes to self-driving fully autonomous cars. Don't let any automotive or telematics company tell you otherwise.
     
  8. Yuki2718

    Yuki2718 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Posts:
    1,757
    Yeah, ads are bad exploitation of psychology. I couldn't stop laughing when seeing Coca-Cola's site advertising safety of artificial sweetener (but ATST blogs who strongly oppose artificial sweetener were also laughable). Everyone can use Google Scholar to find truth, tho I think I know some "subversion of science" cases the original article discussed. And yes, your description of self-driving is right, it's a limitation comes from Sparse-modeling is still a modeling.
     
  9. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    3,987
    Location:
    California
    Omitted:
    • Not forced to look at them? Check.
    Years ago I trained myself not to look at billboards while driving. It's easy to do the same when on a web site.
    Only if you don't bother checking into what the advertising is pushing. You aren't forced to accept at face value what the advertisement states.

    It doesn't have to "corrupt the decision-making process" if you check carefully into what you want to purchase.

    -rich
     
  10. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Posts:
    993
    But it does corrupt the decision-making process because too many people are too lazy to think for themselves.
     
  11. Reality

    Reality Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Posts:
    1,145
    @Keatah It doesn't corrupt the decision-making process for everyone and it most certainly doesn't for me, because I decided long ago I will resist any unsolicited advertising which is almost all of it. I also think it's a bit more complex than just calling people too lazy to think for themselves as a blanket statement. The underhand and devious tricks advertisers get up to to "tip the balance to get people to part with their dollars" is nothing short of despicable. I'm sure anyone who's given this a little thought could easily come up with a laundry list of ways these parasites prey on people.
     
  12. Yuki2718

    Yuki2718 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Posts:
    1,757
    @Rmus
    Well, that's possible if it takes obvious form of ads like billboards, web banners, TVCM, etc. Not necessarilly easy if not. Cancer tries to avoid being caught as cancer. I think it's well-known that (some of) Google or Amazon reviews are poisoned by money, there are people who accuse such shops if they found. And there are native advertising which looks normal contents at first glance. When I first read a blog called Restore Privacy, I thought it was written by a real privacy advocate. I got doubt only after I found the author modified and deleted unfavorable comments, not only mine, to his favorite services, tho I knew the author was affiliated by the service from the beginning. So I agree w/ @Reality for his last comment. I'm also trying not to think "I'm a special" or "I won't be tricked".

    Particularly problematic is health industry. Ofc drug companies advertise, but also doctors and alternative therapists too, sometimes even w/out being aware. I happened to have literacy to understand academic papers in this area, but still found it difficult to make a decision.
     
Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.