Adobe Reader version 10 released !

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by nanana1, Nov 18, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Raza0007

    Raza0007 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Posts:
    1,691
    Location:
    USA
    So has somebody noticed any improvements in the 10 version? Other than the new protected mode, which is more security related anyway. I am specifically asking about improvement in speed, system resource consumption etc. Is it lighter, faster than the previous version? Adobe Acrobat has become progressively bloated since version 6 onwards and most of the time the only improvement in the new version seems to be that it is more bloated than the previous version.
     
  2. Didier Stevens

    Didier Stevens Security Researcher

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    Posts:
    68
    Since its last release, Foxit Reader supports DEP and ASLR. And in an upcoming release, they will support running with a low integrity level. I've been in touch with their security team about this feature. This is an essential step towards a sandboxed application.

    But AFAIK, they have no plans for a real sandbox: e.g. implementing a sandboxing technology that not only contains exploits inside the sandbox, but provides the application access outside the sandbox when necessary, for example to save a file.
     
  3. Raza0007

    Raza0007 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Posts:
    1,691
    Location:
    USA
    Answering my own question. I installed the full version of Adobe Acrobat pro 10 and on my system it performs slightly faster or equal to the Adobe Acrobat pro 8, the version I had previously. So, Adobe did make improvements to this new version 10 to make it lighter and faster. I had skipped the previous Acrobat version 9 as it was heavier on the system than Acrobat version 8, without adding any significant new features.
     
  4. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  5. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    It's not a problem with Adobe Reader X's sandbox. It's just how integrity levels work. An object with a low integrity level (the sandbox) has no write or execution permissions to higher levels, but it's still possible to read data in higher levels.

    The same happens with IE Protected Mode and Chromium based browsers sandbox. And, that happens, because the way integrity levels work.
     
  6. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,062
    Location:
    U.S.A.
     
  7. nanana1

    nanana1 Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Posts:
    947
    Round One goes to Adobe Reader X :thumb:
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2011
  8. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    One would only expect that. :thumb:

    I just hope Adobe Reader X's sandbox (I'm only talking about low integrity level) isn't as poorly implemented as Chromium's. :D (Yes, under a few conditions, Chromium (and every based browser) will be running with the same rights as the account the user is logged in as, be it administrator or standard user. :D Considering Google's engineers could not reproduce - despite the fact Sully, Kee1958, me and one other user could - so, I don't expect it to be solved.)

    Anyway, let's hope Adobe Reader X sandbox does the job as it is suppose to do. :thumb: ... Finally...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.