3.500kb update

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by POS, Dec 6, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. POS

    POS Guest

    I´ve downloaded a 3.500kb update. But the signatures added are not so big. Why?

    NOD32 - 1.1313 (20051206) / posted 13:56)
    Virus signature database updates:
    Win32/Adware.Ezula (3), Win32/Brontok.AG (2), Win32/Dialer.EB, Win32/Haxdoor, Win32/Hupigon (4), Win32/IRCBot.PH, Win32/IRCBot.PM (2), Win32/TrojanDownloader.Tiny.AD (2), Win32/TrojanDownloader.Tiny.Y (2), Win32/TrojanDownloader.VB.TL (2), Win32/VB.AGA (3), Win32/VB.AGC (2)
     
  2. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    Maybe it was the first update after installation?
     
  3. POS

    POS Guest

    No it was not... I use nod for a long time... was with update 1.1312, and today it updated to 1.1313. 3.500kb of update.
     
  4. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    There must be something wrong with the registry, the last 3.4 MB update took place on 26th October and all updates since then were just a few kB large.
     
  5. J at J

    J at J Guest

    Hi,

    I haven't looked at the update size, but I saw those changes (using file integrity checker NISFileCheck) on my W98SE box:

    Application: c:\program files\eset\nod32.000
    Status: Changed
    Version old: N/A
    Version new: N/A
    Size old: 3470594
    Size new: 3473138
    Date old: 2005-12-03 00:59:26
    Date new: 2005-12-06 14:23:12
    RMD160 Hash old: CF7E42B1890773021425796C3DCF7F342869A51F
    RMD160 Hash new: CE3CFDA8C079DC28149341D3F3D06E26D99A9AF3

    Application: c:\program files\eset\nod32.002
    Status: Changed
    Version old: N/A
    Version new: N/A
    Size old: 194551
    Size new: 194544
    Date old: 2005-11-02 23:39:04
    Date new: 2005-12-06 14:23:14
    RMD160 Hash old: 5D35E655598EFBB3712F6DBE0D57CB3C1AD86F5D
    RMD160 Hash new: 24441586F06E500731B831EBBEECE4E817B2835B

    Application: c:\program files\eset\nod32.006
    Status: Changed
    Version old: N/A
    Version new: N/A
    Size old: 5726
    Size new: 5720
    Date old: 2005-11-26 19:39:02
    Date new: 2005-12-06 14:23:14
    RMD160 Hash old: DA890362159263634FB006405A787145F9ADA60A
    RMD160 Hash new: B8B29216DC10D7FC734E42DCC3A07BCEF2E05F54
     
  6. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    I see the archive module has been updated, but didn't look when it was updating so I don't know how much it downloaded.
     
  7. POS

    POS Guest

    Is it something wrong with my nod32 or the update 1.1313 was really 3.5mb?
     
  8. POS

    POS Guest

    Nobody knows?
     
  9. beetlejuice69

    beetlejuice69 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    780
    34 sigs added yesterday and 12 added today.
     
  10. POS

    POS Guest

    Why the 1.1313 update was about 3.5mb?
     
  11. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    Well, I didn't see the size on my real machine because I wasn't here at the time of the update, however, when I manually updated my NOD32 in my VMware it was about 600 KB. Even I didn't updated NOD32 since 1 week in the virtual machine and it was about 600 KB.

     
  12. POS

    POS Guest

  13. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    One of us have a problem. Look at my NOD32 information o_O

    NOD32 antivirus system information
    Virus signature database version: 1.1313 (20051206)
    Dated: Martes, 06 de Diciembre de 2005
    Virus signature database build: 6417
    Your signature database build is 6418 and not 6417 as mine.

    What's happening?


     
  14. POS

    POS Guest

    Hope Hapy Bytes see this thread.. are you using NOD32 for XP and 64bits (2.51.12 or XP only (2.5.25)?
     
  15. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    XP Pro for x86 (32 bit only)
    Maybe I'm wrong but I think signatures are the same for any platform 9X/NT/Linux/x64

     
  16. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    That's because he's using the trial version.
     
  17. POS

    POS Guest

    And what is the diference between the trial and the full version? Does the full version detects more?
     
  18. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    No it's the same. Trial version just has a nice counter that's all ;)
     
  19. sick0

    sick0 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Posts:
    143
    i think trial version's updates are always big...
     
  20. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Not any more, they went to incremental updates quite a while ago...

    Cheers :D
     
  21. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    How long have you been using the trial version for?

    Cheers :D
     
  22. NOD32

    NOD32 Guest

    I´ve formated my HD about 1 week ago. Installed the trial version.
     
  23. mrtwolman

    mrtwolman Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Posts:
    613
    IMHO then it could be componet update...
     
  24. SaM_J

    SaM_J Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Posts:
    13

    hmm

    /Sam
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.