AV-Comparatives February 2007

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by IBK, Feb 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Good to see F-Prot reaching an Advanced level again but sad to see two old stalwarts like Dr Web and McAfee relegated to bottom of the tier. AVG, Avast and Norman continue to improve.

    This means my two main primary scanners are at the Advanced/Advanced+ level now :cool: :blink:
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2007
  2. Pedro

    Pedro Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,502
    Oh no! NOD looses the +!
    Now it's crap, and they're not working well:p
     
  3. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,642
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    How I love KAV! :-*
     
  4. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    And the rise of Avira continues. :)
     
  5. 337

    337 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Posts:
    232
    Location:
    Georgia, USA
    Yep, but as NOD has shown---what goes up must come down!! lol!!
    :cool:
     
  6. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Nice to see that ALL free AVs have at least a A checkmark.
    Also, Symantec is the only one big vendor which keeps on a good level. Almost all the advanced engines come from small companies (Kaspersky, Avira, ESET, Grisoft, Alwill, FRISK, SoftWin, Norman)
     
  7. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
    it's not a rise, it's staggering, it's already at the top (maybe ibk could include advanced++ then it will have the chance to rise even higher :D )
     
  8. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306
    Does TrustPort use the Kaspersky engine? Kaspersky just seems to be the best engine time after time, except for Avira.

    Jerry
     
  9. ScythedBlade

    ScythedBlade Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Posts:
    7
    I have a hatred for Kaspersky. It's SO bloated ~Phrase removed~ compared to NOD32. Vista only makes bloated even more noticable when Kaspersky kinda screws up in vista ... at least for me it does.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 23, 2007
  10. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Crap just for this!!!o_O

    You must read what the levels means... ;)
     
  11. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Let me refresh a few memories here. Nod was the overall winner for last year, and no one can argue that. But IBK also said in his synopsis report that Eset had their work cut out for them if they were going to retain that title this year. And it is nice,"cough":cool: to see that Eset really cant walk on water. I have no doubt, their misfortunes this reporting period will be quickly addressed.

    Avira, he stated was on a course to gain that title this year, and Stefan and the entire group at Avira have yet to display their true ability. It will become apparent over the course of this year. At years end, Avira will have exactly what they set out to create, a security suite that encompasses all, and no fluff or glamour like others. Come on folks, they deserve some kudos for the hard work they have done in a short time.

    Now, the scary part of this, sorry Chris, but the Web sank with the increase of price for spam protection,:mad: , back to my thoughts, the scary part of this is, Kaspersky. Given their ability to produce, when they do roll out heuristic ability this year, no one, and I mean no one, may be able to touch them. And that was their long range plan.
     
  12. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,642
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    I think that TrustPort uses the Norman and BitDefender engines.
     
  13. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306
    I can't deny that if one's machine is slowed by a "bloated" program he would not want to use it. However, the so called "bloated" AVs don't slow mine as near as I can tell.
    So I don't care one whit about whether or not one is bloated. My concerns are that it provides great security, runs well on my machine, and gets along with other applications.
    If it does those things then I will use it, if not I'll find something else.

    I use F-Secure IS on the laptop, and it does what I need. Unless it starts causing problems it is probably a permanent application there. :thumb:

    I am not sure why we get emotional over an anti-virus program.o_O It is just software.

    Thanks Macstorm.

    Best,
    Jerry
     
  14. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
    i don't think kav is bloated. and as for vista it worked okay on my pc.

    plans to word domination? is kav evil, more evil then microsoft :D
     
  15. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Norman + BitDefender + AVG + Ewido.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2007
  16. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306

    Thanks, Lucas. That looks pretty potent to me.
    Best,
    Jerry
     
  17. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,642
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    You're welcome Jerry :)

    I also don't understand this strange feeling, maybe we are all infected by an unknown virus :)

    Regards,
     
  18. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Well that may be true, but it still tells alot.
     
  19. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    AVG Free or professional would not get Advanced. AVG scored well only because AVG AntiMalware was tested, which includes the ewido engine. So, you do not longer can apply the results of the paid version to those of the free versions (except: Avast).
     
  20. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    And e Scan uses the Avira AV scanning engine, if I remember correctly.
     
  21. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    eScan uses Kaspersky. They scored equal.
     
  22. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,642
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    eScan uses the Kaspersky engine AFAIK...
     
  23. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
  24. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    my mistake, I thought escan used webwasher.
     
  25. Mele20

    Mele20 Former Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Posts:
    2,495
    Location:
    Hilo, Hawaii
    Does this apply to Avira free vs paid also?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.