Not so! It can scan single files.
I read yesterday that you can view hidden processes by changing the name of Task Manager to _root_taskmgr.exe
I don't think that AT applications are any different from most things in life: You get what you pay for.
Since February, when BOClean 4.12 was released, I have only seen 1 HJT log posted at DSLR where the poster was running BOClean. It turned out that...
HJT logs posted by users of BOClean are rarer than hen's teeth.
Didn't you know that is the new black.
Ve haf vays of making you see ze joke :)
In response to Kevin's last post. I agree. I have often wondered why so much credence has been given to the ATs review by the inkjet...
There is a danger that you might be mistaken for the "boy who cried wolf".
BOClean :)
There isn't an updated version :)
How do you know that? Most people already have an OD scanner: I use SAV.
BOClean 4.11 has reached the end of its lifetime. It's database can no longer be supported. To remain protected, you need to upgrade to the new...
I should have re-read the thread. I remembered that he had written "I guess I didn't explain myself well. I can't even get to the point where I...
I don't know whether anyone can help this poster at dslr http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12578396~mode=flat I suggested to the OP...
Virtually everyday, if you mean definition updates.
More information here: http://www.nsclean.com/supboc.html
The product is excellent: that's all that matters!
I had not forseen that as a possible scenario. :) A reboot will normally solve the the latter problem.
It is ALWAYS OK to delete the contents of your Temp file. That's what it means (temporary).
Not really, when applications such as KAV have a good reputation for detecting trojans in on-demand scans.
The new version is due out soon, but there won't be a file scanner (is my understanding of the situation) It doesn't bother me at all, as I do...
I don't know why the developer of BOClean has to answer all the crap that emanates from Nautilus, but if you want the answer read here:...
Symantec also names them Bofra. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bofra.e@mm.html
That is a very begrudging admission.
Separate names with a comma.
