Nope as this list saves entries only for 30 days (can be switched off).
You can't empty the sandbox as there is no sandbox (virtualization container, in fact). There is rollback, its onto the "Stop attack" sheet, "File...
In case of FireFox, just run it as trusted, update, close and run as usual, untrusted.
Just placed new build in there. It solves FireFox Aurora/Nightly builds update issue.
Nope. Nope. There are no "false positives" in your terms. DW runs new software installation files, known as good, as trusted automatically (in...
DefenseWall's core technology is not whitelisting, it's a sandboxing-style HIPS system. Whitelisting is used only run run known as good software...
Yep, that's correct. I really hope I'll be able to migrate DefenseWall to x64, but, this case, the program itself will has 4.xx version's numbers.
3.19 is just a minor update. There will be no x64 support, definitely.
Yes, this one.
Game of Thrones? :D
Yep, I'm really interested in it too. May I have a sample of it?
Absolutely not. :)
I say than DW can help against most of the cases. In most of the cases.
Any? I believe, no sandboxing HIPS can prevent any malicious behaviour, but most of it- yes, sure. You simply didn't understand what I mean....
I remember, I remember. :)
It's true. And it's false. What takes malware from attacking users right within allowed sandboxed processes, without running more processes, like...
I have hundreds and hundreds malware files at my hard drive. Should I worry about it? No, because they are inactive. Also, there is a little...
Yes, this was one of the point to check.
Hi! Well, not really. "Uninformed" way is quite old and, I suppose, no use, TDL4 infects MBR that won't work with Win8/UEFI.
Interesting idea. I'll take a deep look into it.
Money- yes, but knowledge is the resource I need too.
Yes, I know. So, I have a plan of migration towards x64 bit Windows. But, right now, I need more resources for that.
I believe that honesty is the best policy in most cases.
The difference between x64 and x32 is about PatchGuard that do not allow to control certain functions safe way.
Without "Experimental protection" is doesn't.
Separate names with a comma.