Since Jetico 1 (which I like very much, after testing a number of firewalls this past 5 weeks) runs as an application (above the driver and...
I am currently running Jetico 1.x, and have found it nice, light, and also with sound protection and control over both port usage and process...
Since the topic of Jetico 1 not being a service (operating at boot), I want to know how important this is if one is running behind a hardware...
Btw, I checked back with Jetico, and the only v2 I can find is a beta, which *is* free. Is there a v2 - not a beta - that is out (and not free)...
Thanks for the heads up. So, other than that quirk, what's not to like about jetico !! //
In the past two months I have tried Sunbelt Kerio 4.3, Comodo, Outpost 4, Sunbelt Kerio (again), and now Jetico. Despite many claims that Jetico...
Sounds about right to me. AfaIct, a good packet-inspector will use from 4 to 30 mb of RAM, depending on system (browsers open, tabs open, lines...
I also use NOD32 and SpySweepr 5.2. I don't know if they force extra RAM usage onto the firewall, but I would say it's very possible, more than...
I had the same question on a couple of other fws I've tried recently. How many connections do you have open? SKerio 4.3 was using up to ~120...
Good stuff, cpr! I took a quick look at your first suggestion, but it's going to take more time than I have at the moment to implement it...
Thanks, Alpha. I'm going to have to read up on this. "Don't need DNS"? I thought this is what translates the numeric designation of a...
How can you do that?? Isn't it necessary to make the connection? Isn't it a called process initiated by Windows via my web browser (Firefox)??
OK, let's talk about svhost.exe for a minute: I know that there are a number of svhost.exe processes running on my computer at any given moment...
I hear many (including myself) quoting leak test results; yet I've also heard some say such tests are meaningless. Got to wonder: what, indeed,...
The above rules you have made are for Outpost 4? Yes, I would say your restrictions on NOD are tight! What are your reasons for that? Afraid of...
What av are you running on your cell?? :) Thank you. I get your point -- and thanks to all the others who answered. I'm still learning!
So you think Jetico offers better security than Kerio 2.1.5? After what you said above about Kerio, that would make Jetico that much better!...
You're right -- the proof is in the pudding! Guess I'll have to saddle up the new version of Outpost to see if they've cleared up the conflicts...
CPR, I know this is a bit OT, but you mentioned you tried (and liked) Kerio 2.1.5. Have you also tried Jetico? If so, how do they compare??...
Yeah, I'd like to see some tests with up-to-date versions of Outpost and Jetico. I'm running Jetico 1.0, to get an idea of how to use a heavy...
If these adjustments within Outpost will effectively avoid any conflicts with Spy Sweeper, then it is a powerful argument to give Outpost another...
The firewalker tests put Jetico right up there, evening besting Outpost 4 in many or most tests. KIS was a bit stronger in some instances. But...
I wonder if that has to do with what apps and open connections you/anyone has at a given time. For example, when I used Ker 4.3, at start up...
Before I go back to give the new 4.0.971.7030 (584) a spin, I'm now putting Jetico 1.0.61 through its paces. So far, so good. It had pretty...
Yes, indeed, one would think if a product advertises a "fix" it would, in fact, fix something!! :-) That rant aside, at least the new Outpost...
Separate names with a comma.
