maybe it is a bit cheeky to ask why not - care to elaborate, it is your statement vs. Eset's moderator? latter working for a AV vendor
begs the question what is the use of any AV and why to pay for it?
Most of the users would have noticed that Eset has evolved since v 2.5, but obviously not to the better. Back then it had an edge over almost any...
You cannot expect a user to come up with technique specifics other than undetected samples, hence your statement in this regard is a bit uncalled...
shown here http://www.prevx.com/avgraph/12/Eset.html as according to Eset Moderator: Please avoid referring to Prevx statistics which are...
Do not reckon that this thread was ever about sanctuary and being saved by an AV, but about a product which scores worst compared to be on top a...
there is nothing wishful thinking, or you prefer 'Sick and tired of ESET letting things through'? right, so by trying to elevate a wakeup call...
right, now a new escape route - just dismiss facts and call them ridiculous... ...wake up and get NOD back on top, where it was with version 2.5!...
http://www.prevx.com/avgraph/12/Eset.html http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/413777/review/smart_security_4.html defending wrongdoing...
difference to NOD? well, they miss on occasions whilst NOD is protecting only occasionally
cannot agree more, though Eset keeps awfully silent on this, except for pointing the finger to the whiny user and advise to switch off NOD modules...
better blame it on the stupid (l)user than admitting something of the product is going terribly wrong and finding ways to get back on track....
point taken, still trust that NOD should not let those through, like this one too http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=270436 or this...
if that true and not just a marketing gag than NOD is one of the worst software claiming protection... http://www.prevx.com/avgraph/12/Eset.html
Interesting, on the host OS WIN 7 64bit IP verification with IE8 and Opera 10.52 is not happening for prevx.com, however on the guest OS WIN XP...
As Steve TX's is pointing out it is their certificate (issued by them?) inside their software. Which in my understanding does not work with e.g....
Happens also on the aforementioned url, this forum as well as all other urls whether popular or not. Since I am permanently travelling I am...
well, then it is not a clean clean install but an upgrade
never had any 3rd party firewall installed. also news that a clean install of WIN 7 leaves such a thing as Windows.Old, never been on my system....
One can still hope... ...however considering the late silence of Eset in this thread and the first of approach to the problem it may turn out the...
Noted, thanks! But I have not installed the Nightly Tester Tools and do not intent to.
thanks for the reply and clarification, though there might be a misunderstand of sort: Do not mean the impact on the browser session, but as...
then let me know please which information your are particularly interested in and will see what can be released, sorry but there is a policy that...
quoting from the thread you pointing to: this is not strictly to malware detection, I would reckon, still appreciate your effort and support...
uhm, TH, do not get me wrong, but he did not ask for it for one and on the other hand I do not see the causality between a system scan, which is...
Separate names with a comma.
