that is one of the core shortcomings in today's AV solutions and a reason that malware is still spreading (beside the careless user) - the AV...
probably will have a shot at NOD v5 and see whether it fairs better than v4. If not I will probably let go of AV products entirely, do not see the...
point being - do not use AV as it cannot protect?
is not frustration, is being shocked that such simple piece of code was not detected. startpage hijackers are common since the early days and a...
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=294574 and I do not know what you mean - NOD is not supposed to deal with spyware but viruses...
don't think there is anything silly pointing to failing parts of a product you bought, one would perhaps do so for a car or facility alarm system,...
that is the job it is being paid for
no attitude here. and I clearly mentioned "please get the core to improve on the detection rate!". as NOD missed such simple malware, which is...
I am well aware of how to submit samples - please do not just rush a post for the sake of posting
that is a simple one an should be caught by NOD... ...but does not. fortunately it is only a homepage hijacker for web browsers File Name :...
no worries there never know, give it a shot. maybe they make you an offer anyways, now that they know
not defending anything, merely blurring out my 5 cents on the matter. of course the world is supposed to be better with straight facts and...
so, you consider dropping the product as the Eset marketing is not up to your liking? well, probably if 10% + of the (potential) customers arrive...
well, then credit to your conscience and inquiring about the Eset marketing strategy! but wondering whether Eset is the only corporation you...
marketing is marketing and competitors hitting each other (MS vs Apple, Oracle vs. SAP, Verizon vs. T-Mobile, Republicans vs. Democrats, ...)....
that is what I thought, if it stays that way through to release I will not buy a license. not sure what the biz policy is behind such move to...
appreciate the feedback but not such important feature missing - seriously in a Release Candidate? is it planned to be released that way?
why has this not been implemented? not feasible/necessary?
reckon you got mixed up here - those proxy settings from the KB apply only for NOD http(s) protocol scanning by NOD, and thus related http(s)...
using applications with http(s) port(s) other than those? if the proxy does then you might add that specific port to NOD, although the NOD should...
throughout the threads related to this issue I cannot trace a single explanation why the updates work stable for days/weeks/months and the sudden...
at 1221 GMT started to see this error again - Eset could you please check your servers and make sure that the updates are not being delivered...
the 64bit libc6 is no good, NOD wants the 32bit, after having installed those the NOD installation went finally through. A bit of headache,...
don't think there is any, I just took the headline off the respective forum post - which might be misleading beta vs. RC...
that helps to the point where the file gets executed. that should probably be put in the installation guide. yet it looks like the NOD...
Separate names with a comma.