Smacky and Toxinon: Thanks for the explanations. They did help, and made clear the usefulness of SysRescue. Roger Folsom
Toxinon12345: For IT ignoramuses, such as the one writing this post (aka Roger Folsom), would you (or anyone else reading this) please define...
nsnidanko: For what it is worth: a) If you search this thread, you will find that a sufficiently early version of NOD32 v4, e.g. something...
yongsua: Thanks for noticing! Roger Folsom P.S. Here's hoping that someone at ESET will notice, and that in the next NOD32 version the...
toxinon: I have run an experiment to test that. The experiment requires being in an Administrator account, in either Windows 2000 (which I use)...
SMART SCAN VS IN-DEPTH SCAN: EFFECTS OF ADVANCED SETUP SETTINGS The following statements may be obvious to everyone else --- although I cannot...
Tony: Thank you for the Eset KB article link, and especially for the good news that if I create SysRescue on an XP computer, and put it on a...
Matt: Although I've been using Eset's NOD32 for several years (beginning with version 2.5.x I think; at least it was 2.x), I've never used...
The NOD32 v 4.2 (.71.2) User Guide, on page 35, describes the SysRescue minimum requirements as follows: "5.5.1 Minimum requirements "ESET...
In my questions at the top of this thread, I got very useful answers to key questions 1) and 2). Thanks again to those who contributed those...
Marcos: Thank you very much for clarifying that. By "scanner" I assume you mean what I have seen elsewhere described as modules: Real-time file...
DrewD: Thank you for your response to my first question. I do understand that these modules are "individually configurable." The layout of the...
The following NOD32 setup questions are naive, because it's been a long time since I did a "clean" NOD32 install (after completely removing my...
tanstaafl: Last October (messages #85 and #91 ) we had some discussion about what to do if a "ghost flag" appears. And I haven't seen any Eset...
I am still using NOD32 AV (not the full security suite) 4.0.474.0. Late last year I didn't upgrade to 4.2.64.12 because of this "Strange NOD32...
tanstaafl: Before I get to your latest post (#91), I have a question. Gaslad's initial post's ghost flag image says "ESET NOD32 Antivirus...
Thanks for the reminder about the last set of digits. Actually, you said something similar in thread NOD32v4.0.474 Installation Questions message...
Found it. Thank you. Using the download file for NOD32 v4.2.64.12 as a test, I don't find a search capability. It may be there, but following...
Jim Willsher Well, at least your post #88 doesn't completely demolish my guess about how you have avoided ghost flags --- I think! Thanks for...
Thanks! Roger Folsom
Jim: In an earlier post (# seventy-eight), you mentioned that you had 115 machines. That, together with your mention here of "EAVBE, pushed out...
Thanks for clarifying that. It inspired me to re-read the entire thread (albeit hurriedly), and Gaslad's initial post did contain an image of a...
I am feeling really stupid. The version is displayed in plain sight, "Version: 4.2.64.12," left of the download link on the download page...
Please excuse my ignorance, but what do you mean by "the 4.2.x branch"? Do you mean that you think the problem arose with the very first 4.2...
I should make clear that I have never seen a "ghost flag" since I started with NOD 32 version 2.5 and am now at 4.0.474. I was telling my wife...
Separate names with a comma.
