It does slow down the browsing, at least with FF.
Yes. It is a bit slow but it's very good.
Whoa the iPhone already got Half of Linux's market share.
Anti-Executable just denies EVERY application from running, except from the ones you want to allow.
http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575664
Defense+.
Norton Antivirus (the non-Symantec version) for Windows 95.
I wonder how good the detection is (signature + heuristic). Anyone<-->Test?
The design looks too...Ad-Awarish.;D
Re: New rouge (MS 2009) Looks so; http://www.spywareremove.com/removeMSAntiSpyware2009.html
Yes, it's one of the best anti spywares out there. It should make a good combo with NOD32 2.7.
I can't post malware links, so what remains is www.eicar.com ;D
It's a useless thing which alerts you about registry changes. A behaviour blocker does a much better job with very few alerts, and not about...
That's only for LinkScanner.
Spybot is useless and won't add any additional protection at all. TeaTimer is useless too, there are better behaviour blockers out there. If you...
I hope they don't make it this lame ;D: [ATTACH]
It's the Http scanner. It doesn't actually slowdown anything, the download speed looks slower, but the download ends sooner.
Some yes, some no.
Yeah, I guess it checks.;D
I don't think that you tested the avira engine... The removal process is done before booting.
Or most likely in forums which check whether files are clean or not.
OS X is currently partially 64-bit, it fully supports x64 apps, but the kernel itself isn't. Snow leopard will be fully.
Self-protection has been added in EAV/ESS 4.0 BETA
Last thing I forgot to mention;D: The Guard is On-Execution ONLY.
Well the pro/plus version are basically Avira (dedicated av) + Ad-aware (dedicated as)
Separate names with a comma.