Why would you advise him to keep spybot? It is obsolete and offers poor protection. It takes forever for an update to be released and asquared...
Lavasoft SE and Spybot Search and Destroy 1.4 are not needed. They are quite obsolete and you should not upgrade to lavasoft Pro. Norton Internet...
Yeah PCMAG has no credibility at all.
They dont have an antispyware though...
Usually the first of June for the the next test unless its delayed. of course if we are lucky maybe even may 31.
I think the test is flawed if NOD32 loses to AVG without the Ewido engine. I do believe in NOD32 slipping but not as much as av-test implies.
Experts... i don't think so. EliteKiller you arguments crushed them but they are stupid to know it.
That test was based on KAV's PDM, not its heuristics, which are really not that good.
In order: Compatibilty and stabilty Detection rates Resource usage Support Scan speed Ease of use GUI
I googled it and it does seem like they use the same engine.
Escan does use the extended database. It is just that virus.gr makes bs tests.
I think Avira wil beat NOD32 by more than just a fraction of a percent in the next one.
Avast provides better detection than AVG free. AVG free's detection must not be confused with AVG anti-malware's detection.
Are you using the free version? If you are you cannot.
use this link if you want to download. i fidn that none of the other mirrors work. ftp://ftp3.tnc.edu.tw/antivir/antivir_workstation_win7u_en_h.exe
Okay il stop bothering you now.
Gah I am just a depserate person. you lean towards av-test saying that they hav more resources than av-compratives. and that is why i keep...
none of us can really prove anything at all. Maybe we should get the opinion of some vendors. We could could ask IC, Marcos, Stefan, vlk, Serge...
I heard Avira 7 doesnt run ver well on Vista. i am not too sure so correct me if I am wrong.
Re: Big differences between 2 turstworthy tests ?
Okay my fps is fixed. That took a million years. next time ill send to Stefan instead of throguh the site to make sure it doesnt take so long to...
They were signatures based detections
I have also submitted two fps that were confirmed to be fps that have not been fixed for 3 weeks.
If you think detection rates are really improtant get Avira Antivir or AOL Active Virus Shield
Could tell it would happen. Grisoft is pretty big. though probably not as much as Panda, trendmicro, mcafee, and symantec
Separate names with a comma.
