its Norton, not Norman.
If it's malware-test it can't be reliable
If you dont include spyware/adware, then Avira Antivir does have the best detection for free antiviruses.
Whatever you do, just don't get Fortinet or you will be bothered by it flagging everything with its extremely paranoid heuristic.
So what do you guys think about it? looks pretty good to me.
People are saying that AVG has the worst GUi because it is aesthetically hideous.
it is the largest amount I have seen in one vdf update and the total today is over 10000
I wonder if bitDefender really would be removed if they are considering taking out an engine. Taking the engine with the best proactive detection...
I don't agree that Avast free beats Avira free. Avira classifies many spyware samples as trojans and also picks up quite a bit with heuristics.
The detection rate isn't very good and Sophos wasn't too mature about it when they saw their poor detection rate at av-comparatives.org and...
Norton
Load of bull if Fortinet is at or near the top.
I cannot even read the pdf.
Why post this? Everyone knows 6starreviews is a load of bs.
Stefan doesnt need you to tell him cuz he already knows this.
NOD comes second to Avira in hsi heart. Im pretty sure he posted that somewhere.
TOtAL BS. I agree with IC.
Dont listen to PCMagazine. Just a load of bs, although i have no grudge against Norton.
if you exclude adware/spyware, the detection capabilities are the same.
That second link is really old and i Don tknow if it is reliable or not.
It better not slow down down anthing. If it does then Avira better let it only be an optional tool that can be uninstalled separately.
that article is infinitely bs.
Im not sure but i do not think AVG has a http scanner. If you are going to get AVG, you should get AVG antimalware or the security suite.
Even with Kevin's help Comodo will need at least 3 years and I think even 3 years is abit generous.
Comodo will need way mroe than a year to catch to other AV's
Separate names with a comma.
