I agree, avast! is just a stable preformer... Look at AVG for example, in the two times they got tested the both times felt out of rating... Also...
I love the Black Vibe so much ;) http://www.avast.com/eng/black_vibe.html Personally I think avast! is getting a much better option every time....
Me personally reverting to Linux more and more. Only use Windows when it's really needed. Microsoft caught the world using big commerce but crap...
But the world is not only about detection mate ;)
BitDefender is the one for me. Detection wise KAV might be a lil better, but BitDefender is improving and their new pro-active method is gonna be...
Didn't the McLaren engines always seem to blown up the last season? :P :-*
The real problem with Norton is that it's recource hungry... But there are more AV's with this issue... There is like a big anti-norton spirit on...
I never had tracking cookies... Just use SpyBlaster (it's not running real time so don't worry) just update it and run it once in a while to...
Here you go... http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=411954&postcount=17 http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=411955&postcount=18
Same problem here, they prolly closed the subscriptions...
I'm looking forward to F-Prot 4 as well... But you can say what you want, the current 3.16b isn't too bad as well... But there sure are many...
Once again Kaspersky and F-Prot are fast with updating... BitDefender had quick updates too... McAfee detected pro-active (surprising to me)......
I love this... And such reports keep me getting back to F-Secure :)
But eTrust EZ Antivirus uses VET engine wich didn't pass your test :(
BitDefender and F-Secure are very easy to use as well, or consider avast! :)
??? An echo for what my friend ;)
NVIDIA SoundStorm here :D on a Epox nForce 2 SSP board great quality sound IMHO
Thanks all for help... One little thing: http://www.useice.com/_chtnarm.htm only mentions the Personal Pro 4.5? I need the normal Personal right?...
Do 5.0 registration keys work on this 4.5?
Tjk tjk, BitDefender 8 Corporate Client Standard as stated on the website doesn't even exist... The official name is "BitDefender Client Standard...
I know there are already a lot of threats about Kaspersky, but I've some additional questions... Right now I'm testing McAfee VirusScan...
Wich one of the two? About detection or recource usage?
Panda isn't bad at detection I would rate it top 5 for sure... But it's dragging peoples computers, and I personally noticed stablity problems :(
I agree with RejZoR, ArcaVir is nice, but not as good as Kaspersky, BitDefener, McAfee or NOD32 (yet) ;)
If your computer is slow, use this Firefox build (http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=215104) in order of Netscape 8... You can consider...
Separate names with a comma.
