PC World is a home user magazine. Lets not forget that. So a lot of the things that malware enthusiasts (like us) pay no attention to, and in fact...
Agreed :-). The AV Comparatives is not a real-world test, and doesn't test all the protection capabilities of the product, just the on-demand...
What if the signature is not in the cache and your connection is OFF or the server is unavailable/overloaded ? Wait I know the answer..:P Also,...
Looks like Immunet is been busy ghostwriting.. what a deceptive company....
This move by Kaspersky their real motive, which is its not about building great software to protect PCs, its about making money, plain and simple.
Holy smoke. 12 processes !!! That is one big dog.
Simple. The "well known" ones don't test correctly. If you have read the thread, you would have noticed one of the "big names" IBK from...
I think it has everything to do with bang for buck. These tests are expensive, and every new product added to the test costs that much more....
Can Avast be original in any way. I mean seriously, they need stop copying Norton.
Actually what you see is not far from the truth. A lot of their customers are throwing the sh*t at them. I did. KIS2010 totally sucks compared to...
Yuck.. here is a tip. Look at the Norton 360 v4 Beta user-interface.
I agree..
How do you guys have licenses for so many ovelapping Norton products.. deep pockets ?
The detailed testing methodology in the pdf is nothing like I have ever seen before and I am surprised that you think the guys that executed that...
Sureeeee.. everyone is paid by someone.
Oh no.. not another "Total" security. I wonder when everyone going to come out with a "360".
This I agree with. You simply don't go around tapping yourself on the back, its bad form.
I am sure if Symantec had done this and the free product had done poorly, someone would have said "what do you expect.. its a free product. How...
No, Pleonasm and I are NOT related.. but we do think alike:P
Yes, you are effectively implying that Symantec is involved in some kind of deceptive practices. And Pleonasm is correct.. where is your proof...
This once again proves the point that for the immature technologies that mostly depend on the AV signatures, VirusTotal is a good venue to prove...
Even though I am dont use Eset anymore, I am a little surprised that they did so badly on this test. They used to be very good in 0-day protection...
Before anyone posts further, read the testing methodology in the report, not just the results . Looks like pbust is the only one that has done so...
Another baseless comment. Norton has invested 10 years in Intrusion Prevention and Browser Protection technologies that detect malicious content...
The thread is a clear demonstration of how bad the state of affairs is with AV testing in general. There is an established pecking order of who is...
Separate names with a comma.
