There are numerous exploits being disclosed about the image uploading activex applications at FaceBook, Myspace and Yahoo. See here for more...
Not always, it depends when Eset places the PCU (Program Component Update) on the servers.
Relax folks, the Admins and Mods are quite capable and active and they do step in when needed.
The second tab on the right side is for renewals. Your license will work with either NOD32 2.7 or 3.0.
NO, this isn't turning into a bashing thread. At least not with/from me. I was just asking to clarify what you said that you then said you didn't...
Looks like you said it there as well. Doesn't seem to be too many ways to take that. Sounds like Dr. Web catches everything to me.
What I don't get is, If they are ALL zero day, doesn't that by definition mean they should all be heuristic detections? The vast majority seem to...
Another reason they are used almost exclusively by malware creators. Not sure how worrying that a crack or cheat may be infected compares to...
Those "oddball" packers as you call them are generally used to pack malware, they are used because of how they pack data makes it exceptionally...
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Yes, I have wondered exactly where they get their samples from as well. I keep an eye on this site, but i am, like a lot of others here, not sure...
No, it suggests that those files are either associated with a Sonic Solutions product, they make CD/DVD authoring software, or with a Veritas...
SUS.dll is related to Sonic or Veritas if you have either one of those installed. http://www.spywaredata.com/spyware/malware/sus.dll.php...
You can only lead the horse to the water, it will drink only when it's thirsty however.
Isn't it time for you to change your AV again? Cheers;D
Did you not read my next post? GREED.
Yep, even a broken clock is right once a day, sometimes twice.
The motivation is as old as man is, it is called greed and has been around since caveman days. Unfortunately governments can not be trusted either.
Why try and blame the people that are trying to fix the problem? Why not blame those creating the problem in the first place?
Huh? My answer had zero to do with whether the test is valid or not. Someone said they didn't post version numbers, I said they did. I did not...
They do; They even list what options were used for each scanner. Kaspersky Anti-Virus for File Server Kaspersky $190.00 US 5.5.18...
It wasn't there at first, I guess he editted it to add it.
What are you talking about, this is an urban legend, Windows 3.1 could address up to 512MB, Win9X could support 1GB and XP 2GB....
Thanks Bubba, I thought I was the only one that missed something.
Correct.
Separate names with a comma.
