You should not present your own impressions or desires as facts. This is misleading for others! a) David had stated that he will continue the...
No, that's a misunderstanding. I get no dialog at all. The pdf file is opened immediately (desired behaviour) but additionally it is downloaded...
Sure. But even David himself recommends the change to the plus-Version (not so much for security reasons, I think, but as the more "modern"...
Yes, always speaking about pdf-files and opening with "PDF-XChange Editor" as preferred action. In this case I have an undesired "double action":...
Perhaps my idea is a little bit too unclear or general but nevertheless I will try to express it: Many users seem to use Sandboxie for a...
In daily use I browse with Firefox always within Sandboxie. But of course I made all the tests we were discussing with Firefox outside of...
O.k. We'll see what version 102 will bring in this respect.
What will be an additional advantage to the already existing option of an (automatic) download to a place chosen by the user? Someone who prefers...
I must admit that I never cared a lot about my temp folders (except of emptying them from time to time). ;) Moreover I use Firefox exclusively in...
@Brummelchen : O.k. I will see how I will continue. Just two remarks: I still do not understand if you use in Firefox "Open with PDF-XChange...
I could narrow the source for the issue (but not fix it): - I tested with "Fehlerbehebungsmodus": The issue continued (--> undesired "double...
Yes, I think I will have to try something like that. Bad for you, but good for me to hear that I am not alone. :D Thanks for your feedback.
I know. And my intention was to reset it (to "True") now as the new option exists. I tried it with your link. It did not work for me. :( As soon...
For me the new option concerning the download behaviour does not work completely as it should. Here my configuration: [ATTACH] --> I have...
For me it works this way with version 1.0.21 (using Firefox and Chrome) ;) : - The colored border is here with both browsers. - The # is here in...
@TheRollbackFrog, @jimminy, @jphughan, from my side too many thanks for your interesting and useful explanations. :thumb:
My situation is in a certain way the reverse of beethoven's one: Since 5-6 months I have definitely bad sectors, as CrystalDiskInfo shows me...
Maybe I don't understand correctly the situation but isn't this the desired behaviour (from the aspect of security)? E.g. when the unsandboxed app...
First of all: Thanks, David, for v1.0.18. :thumb: Moreover I would like to second henryg1's above questions. My idea is: to replace my old...
Ah, o.k. Thank you, David. :thumb:
I don't know if the following issue is caused by version 1.0.17. Anyway I think I have noticed it only during the last time (perhaps since one...
Some interesting considerations in the above postings. If I have understood it correctly, my own setting is a combination of two methods: a) for...
Indeed it doesn't. And I think it can help me to avoid situations as the one described e.g. in the meantime by Minimalist: You know that I am...
@algol1 : I see. Thanks for the explanations. Yes. For this reason I also have the browser as leader-program. Sandboxie can be a quite...
In order to avoid what I have marked with bold letters: Wouldn't it be also an option to forbid the sandboxed running of the editor (by adding its...
Separate names with a comma.
