Putting most of one company's resources in the benefice of most of their costumers is the right thing to do. Following that logic, stop feeding...
Take your beloved AV-C tests, look who is number one in there, buy it, install it. Where is the problem?. As for Prevx, it would make as much...
Safe Online works flawessly for me and I'm very happy with the kind of protection that it offers. I guess that what is useful in a security app...
Everything that is described in this thread used to happen to me when I was running Prevx alongside AVG9. I always felt that something went wrong...
It is important to verify that a malicious site is indeed malicious. It would be terrible to try to enter a scam web page and be redirected to Amazon.
I'm in love with you, you foolish little thing. Can't you hear my heart beating?. Lets go to the barn and let nature do it's job!.
Everybody has a "knows-it-all" brother in law that ruins all the family meetings, don't believe you are so special.
Posts number 2, 11, 13, 15 and 23. In your last post you only quoted previous ones. You got us: we are stupid, you are smart. We are all...
Some favorable tests quoted by Symantec: http://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=20091027_04
Bit Defender has a 64 bit version too, no?. At least there was a lot of noise about it a couple of weeks ago.
No FPs with MBAM here, either. And as for Norton Power Eraser, it's in beta and they clearly state that it's a "when everything else fails"...
Known issue: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=269439
Safe Online alone, no. Prevx3 with Safe Online, yes. Here is a review: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2346861,00.asp There shouldn't...
Crystal clear. You won't be banned for copyright reasons, that's for sure.:-X
Maybe because the test company's results are confidential?. That's their business: selling the information that they generate with their tests.
My brother's computer got infected with this a month and a half ago. Free AVG and Avast failed but Norton did block and clean it.
I was speaking in general, not criticizing the article.
So, basically, because some AVs fail and those are the ones to avoid. That's why those tests are useful. But, why are (or have been) they the...
Well, in my case, I don't quite understand this way of testing: "The fact a system is not infected doesn't mean (in this context) that Norton...
Prevx's scan focus on active threats. It ignores files that sit there doing nothing, but will block them if they become active with it's realtime...
A lot of black helicopters in the air this morning. They come for me............and you. But I am smarter because a saw them first.
Oooops..........;D
It's absolutelly logical that a reviewer reproduces the exact steps that a normal user follows when facing an infection that his antivirus can't...
Also try lowering Prevx self protection settings (default is 'maximum').
If he removes the threats manually, how can he test the antivirus he is testing?. Seriously, before going labeling another person as an inept or...
Separate names with a comma.
