Thanks for the heads up!
What's wrong with Windows Firewall?
Can you elaborate on this?
But will the threat be detected even if it was on your porch? Or is it possible for the malware to activate and disable the AV or something before...
That's exactly my point! From what I can see if you switch to alternate applications and keep them updated what's the point of...
If one only uses Sandboxie only for their web browser and not for trying new programs, wouldn't the only protection Sandboxie offers is against...
Yes, I've used Sandboxie for more than a year and GesWall for several months.
But if it's running in memory wouldn't it have a file on your computer?
So do all web scanners have specialised signatures for detecting web exploits?
Apps such as Sandboxie, GesWall and DefenseWall are very popular here. But what's the use of them? Does it really provide any extra level of...
You don't need to pay to achieve good security. If you simply use common sense (not saying you don't of course), keep regular image and file...
I guess you're right. I was just thinking that it's relatively simple compared to most classical HIPS.
What do you mean? If a malware was downloaded onto a computer wouldn't it be immediately detected as soon as it was written to the disk?
How do these actually work? Do they use the same signatures as the resident scanner? Does it actually provide any extra protection? I think...
I also agree with Prevx, though I don't know if it specifically monitors those types of behaviours. Online Armor is also a good option.
+1. Prevx is a great product.
I've had various FPs with ST even without installing ClamWin.
I believe Prevx is using cloud-based behaviour technology, wouldn't this be more effective than cloud-based AV?
Anyone who goes around attacking various security vendors in a very immature fashion is dubious. The burden of proof is on them to prove that they...
Re: It's enough Your setup's fine. Yes, I believe UAC is similar to a HIPS. Just also remember to use common sense.
Well...then aren't they of rather dubious reputation?
I'm really confused. :-\ Aren't they the same guys who published this test?
If you don't mind me asking would Prevx consider it ethically wrong to recommend the free version on websites?
Um... SSupdater isn't exactly a trustworthy source.
Yes, it's OK. Just remember to have safe practices (mainly just use common sense) and have an image backup.
Separate names with a comma.