Apparently that's already happened. ;D :ouch:
Prevx has an unlimited trial version which can detect but can't remove malware.
Virus Bulletin's results seem to be rather dubious if this is anything to go by.
IMHO Prevx is a great product and they have great support, but their marketing is a bit dubious.
What PDF readers would most current exploits work with? Is it just Adobe Reader, and if so what versions of Adobe? Thanks
Are those new tests reliable? What about Remove-Malware or MalwareResearchGroup?
Which tests do you think are reputable? Thanks
Would one be vulnerable with default settings? How do you configure scripting in Firefox? Would something like disabling Javascript or using...
Would users find the whitelisting solution too restrictive? IMHO it's very easy to achieve good security with low usability but much harder to...
Real-time Windows Firewall Prevx Edge trial ThreatFire (due to interesting suggestion in PC Mag's review of ThreatFire) On-demand Returnil...
Would a sandbox contain vulnerabilities in browsers, flash player, etc? Would one be vulnerable to something like "Gumblar" if no sandbox is used?
Which product has a 10% detection rate?
Prevx and ThreatFire are both excellent programs, both have free versions (though Prevx's free version only detects malware).
I think Hitman Pro doesn't have a full scan feature so it might not be the most optimal program if you want to verify all your files are clean? Of...
IMHO ThreatFire, Prevx, or AntiVir Personal by itself is already enough, not to mention adding PC Tools Firewall Plus, AVG LinkScanner, and...
Lol, it looks just a little bit overkill to me. ;D
Personally I would replace WinPatrol with Prevx or ThreatFire. As others have said keeping your apps up to date is very important, you can...
Configuring CIS for Maximum Security with ZERO Alerts. But IMHO Comodo isn't the ideal choice in this situation - if you don't mind him being...
I agree that their grading system seems strange, but that does not necessarily constitute as bias, they simply have different views on what...
There's a lot of posts that are bashing PC Mag, but I can't really see anything that's wrong with it. How isn't it a credible source?
How common is it for malware in the wild to be able to bypass lowered rights? Thanks
Since OA also has a HIPS they'll probably be a lot of overlap, and possible conflicts.
Thanks for the heads up!
IMHO If you're already using Online Armor's firewall and HIPS you should just use their RunSafer, it provides great protection.
Separate names with a comma.