Yet more on my Windows 7 issue: I can enble all the Anti-Exploit options under the heading 'Microsoft Processes, Java etc.' with the exceptions of...
More on my Windows 7 issue: it seems to help if I disable the Anti-Exploit options under the heading 'Microsoft Processes, Java etc.' Applying...
One reason why I persist in using Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro 9.3 is its ability to control DNS traffic and restrict it, in my case to OpenDNS.
I'm still mithering on about OSArmor and Windows 7. I had been setting Google Chrome to use Strict Site Isolation and enabled that experimental...
Windows XP is no problem. Windows 7 is. I don't know about Vista. Windows 8.1 has no issues.
I am not sure if I understand the concept but thank you for that insight. I now better understand what is lost by my measures to prevent OSArmor...
To do without OSArmor Anti-Exploit is a small price to pay for being able to use its Main and Advanced protections if the alternative is no...
Since just after OSArmor 1.4 appeared, I have submitted two or three gripes about it hanging Windows 7 on slower hardware. I followed up a couple...
I had reported that the Windows 7 issue had abated. Alas it has not. I surmise that the driver has some flaw which creates a timing problem on...
This is a performance thing. I have decided to include the processes for Panda Dome Free 18.05 and Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro 9.3 in...
Thank you Andreas for OSA 1.4 final release. All advanced options are enabled and it works beautifully with my Windows XP SP3 system. The...
Fortunately customer support is rarely needed. The main problem is installation where Panda installation can abort for reasons such as a locked...
When running Panda Free including 18.05 on pre-SSE2 processors, I disable the Panda Devices Agent service which oddly requires a SSE2 compliant...
I am very happy with them. The host systems run well and smoothly. Neither has reported FPs (yet?) but the occasional PUP is reported. For those...
What is the problem with Avast and Panda Dome? Why should I not have confidence in their protection?
In an earthquake I would rather be in a hut with sandbags than a solid house. The number of people with Windows 7 and later whose PCs/laptops are...
To those who consider Windows XP dangerous, I have to say that since my two incarnations of Windows XP were installed in 2004 I have yet to...
That's fine with me. I don't expect much new software so the existing rules are fine and dandy. OSArmor being better than nothing is an...
Regarding my previous comments on OSArmor seeming to cause the OS to appear to hang, I have noticed that the OSArmor SVC and UI processes have a...
I am deeply disappointed to have to say that one of my Windows XP systems has got glued up in a similar way to my Windows 7 systems. XP became...
I wish to offer a suggestion which is to add the option for a one-off bypassing of blocking a process (without adding it to the Exclusions.db...
I have been happily using OSArmor with Windows XP SP3 since the beginning of 2018 and now running OSArmor Test 61. The host computers both date...
Thanks for the tip. I now have the plain content tags in my repertoire.
Not even a hint of a problem with my two XP SP3 systems. The behaviour is very good and has been improving with each new version.
That post is a great little insight into the composing of exclusions. I guess it's like learning language when a small child. I have contrived a...
Separate names with a comma.
