Editorials from PCWorld..

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Longboard, Jun 29, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    two Three Four little reads:

    Opinions:
    http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/software/
    Heh: just to keep the pressure up..
    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/147606/dear_microsoft_thanks_for_the_help_linux.html
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,146400-page,1-c,software/article.html

    A nice little list
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128154-page,1-c,stepbystep/article.html
     
  2. ccsito

    ccsito Registered Member

    I don't know why it would be referred to as Windows 7? From my estimation, shouldn't it be Windows 9?

    Windows 3.11
    Windows 95 (windows 4)
    Windows 98 (windows 5)
    Windows 2000/ME (windows 6)
    Windows XP (windows 7)
    Windows Vista (windows 8 )

    But then, of course, some of the OS releases were not really that much different from the previous version. :doubt:
     
  3. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Windows 95 and 98 count as windows 4.
    Windows 2000 and XP count as windows 5.
    Windows Vista counts as windows 6.

    Each group used a different system structure.

    Eg. Vista has a "Users" directory and XP/2000 use a "Documents and Settings" directory
     
  4. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Vista is the 6th release of the NT kernel, so 7 makes sense as a name for the next Windows version.
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    It doesn't because I doubt the kernel will be updated to version 7 for the next version, seeing that current reports say it will be mostly an optimization and improvement of Vista.....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice