AV-Comparatives: Business Test Factsheet August-September 2020

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Minimalist, Oct 15, 2020.

  1. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,881
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
  2. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,546
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Shockingly bad performances from Sophos, Cisco, Carbon Black, FireEye and CrowdStrike. I wonder what's up with that. :doubt:
     
  3. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    What interests me are the "deviations from default" test settings. I don't know what to make of this. Not all "deviations" are created equal. And actually, as many enterprises may be targeted, this is actually where the interest should lie primarily.

    As for scores, there goes the red stuff in the graphs again, injecting a little marketing bias. All products scored above 90%--it looks like BitDefender, Vipre and ESET aced it. But again, those extra settings away from the products' defaults...one might wonder how much of a role that played for better or worse. :doubt:
     
  4. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,546
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    To be honest, I don't really understand what you mean. Seems like all products were tested with most security modules enabled, so at first sight it seems like a fair test to me.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.