What is your security setup these days?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by dja2k, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. Overkill

    Overkill Registered Member

    It's rare but sometimes I just browse without it because it's a tad faster when it's not sandboxed
     
  2. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Replaced VRAS with MBAE after concerns of obscurity and lack of updates. Updated EMET to 5.1, which removes Chrome protection. I'll respect that, and rely on MBAE + HMP.A instead.
     
  3. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    I tried emsisoft security suite but it slowed my pc down :)
     
  4. WildByDesign

    WildByDesign Registered Member

    Maybe I am missing the context here, but why do you say that updating EMET to 5.1 remove protection from Chrome? They just enhanced it slightly by enabling EAF+ mitigation for Chrome with this release.
     
  5. Overkill

    Overkill Registered Member

    Did it really?
     
  6. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Oh, forgot to import popular software XML. I just used recommended settings. Now let's see if Chrome breaks... *Nope.
     
  7. Behold Eck

    Behold Eck Registered Member

    I see what you mean but when I ever do it I end up feeling like a Hermit crab out of it`s shell and I`m not long scuttling back under it.

    Regards Eck:)
     
  8. Overkill

    Overkill Registered Member

    I am the same way. 99.9% of the time when I am browsing without sbie, i'm only going to my fav tech sites like wilders or malwaretips etc
     
  9. bo elam

    bo elam Registered Member

    Even here, I am sandboxed. If I was to go to the Vatican's or Mother Theresa's site, I ll still do it under Sandboxie. I don't do any browsing without Sandboxie.

    Most things that I do in the computer I do it using Sandboxie. If I create a Word or Excel file, I do it sandboxed. Its my file but still, I am used to doing it like that. All done automatically:)

    Bo
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    I just install it again and it is just fine now it was my internet provider that the network was very slow but now it is ok:)
     
  11. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Removed CCE and EEK. First one gave me yet another FP and still hasn't been updated, while the second takes forever updating. Never really needed them anyhow.
     
  12. Desktop setup (Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bits)
    - Recovery: Weekly Windows Image and Syncback Free data backup to NAS and USB-disk
    - Hardening: Windows Firewall (also blocking outbound), GPO (disabled risk-ware/autoruns)
    - Mitigation: MBAE (=browser+µBlock block 3rd scripts/iframes), EMET (+ASR office aps)
    - Whitelist: UAC (block elevation unsigned), SRP (default deny basic user, allow admin)
    - Blacklist: Norton DNS (connect safe), Chrome (safe browsing), µBlock (anti-ad lists)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 12, 2014
  13. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Hi Kees.

    Why EMET + MBAE?
    Do not fear a conflict?
     
  14. FleischmannTV

    FleischmannTV Registered Member

    I guess MBAE free for browser and EMET for the rest, which MBAE free does not cover.
     
  15. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Hi FleischmannTV.
    Is possible with the Experimental Version.
     
  16. Exactly, have added jscript.dll and vbscript.dll to ASR of all office programs.
     
  17. WildByDesign

    WildByDesign Registered Member

    Actually, that's a pretty smart idea to use MBAE Free to protect browsers only and EMET to protect Office apps and others. Should be no conflicts that way since the two programs are protecting completely different programs. Brilliant.
     
  18. Behold Eck

    Behold Eck Registered Member

    I only go online unsandboxed to update firefox and stuff like that even then I dont hang around.......it`s a jungle out there.

    Even if it feels a bit sometimes like putting on a stab vest to go and see Granny, then again trust no program.

    Regards Eck:)
     
  19. bo elam

    bo elam Registered Member

    ....or site. Thats exactly what I do with Sandboxie and NoScript, Eck.
    If Sandboxie feels heavy in any way, then its probable that your real time scanner is scanning the activity that goes on inside the sandbox, that might slow down things a little or your web guard has a minor conflict with SBIE.

    Me, I got nothing but Sandboxie and NoScript. So, using or not using Sandboxie, feels exactly the same. I cant tell the difference.:)

    Greetings, Eck:cool:

    Bo
     
  20. Overkill

    Overkill Registered Member

    I know...I get complacent when running sbie :)
     
  21. ichito

    ichito Registered Member

    On Vista still in work:
    OA Free with RunSafer mode for apps like internet/media/pdf browsers, word/excell, media players, etc (all those apps are marked as "untrusted")
    CryptoPrevent (silent) + Shadow Defender
    on demand: Keriver 1-Click Free, Crystal Security, EEK, Kaspersky AVZ Antiviral Toolkit
    Fierefox with NoScript and AdGuard addon.
     
  22. harsha_mic

    harsha_mic Registered Member

    Laptop (using it main PC :))
    Win 8.1 --> ESS 8, OPEN DNS, HMPA CTP4, Chrome (uBlock, uMatrix), behind a router with a firewall.
    --> HMP Ondemand
    DEsktop
    Win 8.1 --> Avast, OPEN DNS, Chrome (uBlock <dynamic filtering: 3rd party iframe blocked>), behind a router with a firewall.
     
  23. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    I've installed Quihoo 360 IS and I like it this far. :thumb:

    EDIT: it slowed down my internet browsing, so I removed it...
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2014
  24. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    That was quick :D
     
  25. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Yes, without real-time AV page loading is really fast. It's hard to go back, when you get used to it :)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice