Wow! Look at WSA at AV-Test

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by trjam, Mar 23, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    8,947
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Congrats to Webroot. Here
     
  2. Narxis

    Narxis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Posts:
    477
    Very interesting test.
     
  3. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,978
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
    Very good :thumb: and congratulations to Joe and the team! They're definitely getting there! And with just one FP also! Wonder what particular build was used in this test?
    Thanks trjam :thumb:
     
  4. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    5,955
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    WSA is simply awesome :thumb:....gonna rock the the tests in the upcoming months and years.......
     
  5. STV0726

    STV0726 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Posts:
    900
    I am so excited. I posted it in the Prevx forum mistakenly too but I think this is big enough where we can let that slide. ;)

    This is such a HUGE improvement in such a SMALL period of time.

    It's like every week they make a milestone. I love this company. Webroot is taking it beyond proactive and comprehensive. Those words have been used before. They are becoming one of the first and only true PROGRESSIVE Internet security companies!
     
  6. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    3,955
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    A little perspective; there are still 8 products as high or higher than WSA in Protection in this test.

    And let's see it tested on a number of other sites before we declare it "King of the Hill". Improving yes.

    PS I am running WSA.
     
  7. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,451

    What he said.

    WSAs results were solid, but not extraordinary. It's big claim to fame is supposed to be it's lightness on the system, yet it was beat by the venerable AVG free in that regard.
     
  8. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    8,947
    Location:
    North Carolina
    this isnt about competition with other products, but more about the, now factual, improvement in WSA and its detection ability. This shows, what Joe has been saying, and folks like me have been doubting.

    No, it doesnt make WSA hte worlds greatest, it isnt suppose to. But it does show, as I am hoping AV-C will also, that WSA is becoming one heck of a piece of software.
     
  9. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    5,955
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    +1 .....I completely agree :thumb:......
     
  10. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,451
    Prevx has mostly been one of the better programs in terms of protection, so I don't expect anything less from WSA. Hopefully they continue to improve.
     
  11. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    740
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    I a more surprised at McAfee scoring 5 in Detection this time :D
     
  12. chris1341

    chris1341 Guest

    The real congrats as always on AV-Test go to Bitdefender. Only one of 2011 tests did not show a 6.0 on detection and that was 5.5. Why they are AV-Test's product of the year and got the top detection award from AV-C I suppose. F-Secure and Bullgaurd there or there abouts no doubt helped by the Bitdefender signatures they use.

    Kaspersky solid as a rock as usual.

    As for WSA, delighted it is improving on the only real weak area noted so far in its admitedly short life. A word of caution though - one swallow does not a summer make. Encouraging signs though for some very commited people who have produced something quite remarkable by providing a product of such scope in such a small package.

    Challenge laid down to the big boys - security no longer needs 800 MB of disc space or to consume so much resource. Here's hoping anyway :D

    Cheers
     
  13. Thankful

    Thankful Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    3,021
    Location:
    New York City
    Nice to see Symantec with 6.0 on detection.
    Panda Free doing quite well overall.
    Bitdefender and Kaspersky very consistent in their excellence.
     
  14. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    4,151
    Location:
    USA
    I like these type of test more than most. Eset just keeps doing worse, and worse on these type of test. Kaspersky seems to consistently score high on these type of test, and other test from other independent sources as well. Maybe I should have switched to Kaspersky this year instead of renewing my 8 Eset license. I guess it's a good thing I use WSA with NOD 32. Eset seems to have gone from the days of cutting edge to rusted edge lol Congrats to Webroot though! :thumb: I believe WSA will just keep getting better over time.
     
  15. Sherlock_Holmes

    Sherlock_Holmes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Posts:
    1,324
    Location:
    Mumbai
    How much time for the free version [ aka the prevx facebook version ] ?
     
  16. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    There was a talk either at last Christmas or last New Years Eve... We're near April 2012. Still nothing.

    But, soon is a word that, for Prevx/Webroot, may not have the same meaning it has for everyone else. :D
     
  17. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    8,947
    Location:
    North Carolina
    better late and stable, then early and cruddy.;)
     
  18. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    8,947
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Eset is really taking a beating. They have got to figure this out for survival.
     
  19. Sherlock_Holmes

    Sherlock_Holmes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Posts:
    1,324
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Hope so it comes out soon
    Good to have an added layer
     
  20. Esse

    Esse Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Posts:
    350
    Anyone know why Emsisoft is not represented?
    Would be nice to see them in this test as the do well in other tests.

    Cheers

    /E
     
  21. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Thanks for the compliments everyone! If you look at the underlying data you'll see just how strong it is: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/tests/test-reports/test-reports/?tx_avtestreports_pi1[report_no]=120525

    The only reason why we aren't even better is because of the 1% dip in January. February shows a definite improvement, and I expect this to continue going up significantly. The cleanup/repair score will also be dramatically improved moving forward as we continue to improve our cleanup engine.

    Thanks again! :thumb:
     
  22. Thankful

    Thankful Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    3,021
    Location:
    New York City
    No progress has been made with their malware cleaning. It's still awful.
    I don't see them leveraging their HIPS into better detection.
    It just hasn't happened.
     
  23. STV0726

    STV0726 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Posts:
    900
    I shall risk coming off as a fanboy in an attempt to defend WSA's scores as remarkable...

    Webroot SecureAnywhere:

    * Showed a HUGE improvement margin in such a short time.

    * They scored great on the "slow-down", but even more impressive is the RAM usage which isn't tested. No other product on that list uses just 18mb of RAM.

    * I doubt many of the products on that list offer heuristic options as granular as WSA. If all set to max, the detection will go up. And I've had this configuration for years with Prevx too and experienced very few false positives.

    * I'm 99% certain no other product on that list will connect to your computer for free and fix any failure on their part. Not to keep harping on that, but it's important to keep in mind.

    With that being all said...

    Yes, I have also stated consistency is key. Let's see how they continue to do through mid-2012, and then by the year in review.

    I just find it worth noting that all known-reputable, valid, and relevant testing bodies that have reviewed WSA have now said fantastic things about it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2012
  24. sportsfan7700

    sportsfan7700 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Posts:
    484
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas USA "Where the West Begins"
    I'm trialing this and am impressed! My PC is only an Intel Pentium R with 2 gigs, 500 gb hard drive. Makes it run like new!
     
  25. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    5,862
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    agree about eset. i really like the product and use it on many machines but man they keep getting worse and worse every year in tests like this, though i can say in day to day use it does protect very well, i have seen it do its job many times and do it well.

    avast has greatly improved in this test over the last year for sure. though one thing makes be a bit skeptical is look at how well norman did. i have tested norman personally and it failed miserably for me. not sure how it got the score it did and it def was a system hog and they say its not.

    webroot is a great program and i use it on some systems but i have to say i find it a bit overprotective at times which is why i dont use norton. i have a lot of legit files that norton's thinks or flags as bad and i have seen this with webroot ill have to give it a go again now if this has been improved on.

    everyone else seems about average as they normally are...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.