What up with F-Prot

underrated and underpriced is were F-Prot stands right now.

the price alone should welcome many customers to Fprot

 

Agreed.

 

I think that F-Prot deserves a big fat

1) They keep a low profile
2) They work hard and improve
3) They don't complain they got "standard" and they don't question the validity of tests/ratings with unsubstantiated claims.

Way to go.

 

I have licenses for multiple products, while I won't name companies, F-Prot's Vista beta is more stable than other companies supposed released or Gold versions for Vista.

 

Hi Flyrfan111,

Thanks for your input. I'm not questioning the stability of the F-Prot beta nor the quality of the company; instead, I'm asking when the "beta warning" will be recognized as not necessary/relevant by the F-Prot team themselves and, thus, removed from the installation warning.

Thanks again.

Regards,
Jim

 

Hi Peter2150,

Thanks for your advice.

I did sneak F-Prot on two machines running Vista Ultimate, and I had no problems whatsoever; nevertheless, when the good folks in Iceland see fit to remove the beta warning, I'll feel even more confident and will once again reinstall my multi-computer licenses with no hesitations or reservations.

Regards,
Jim

 

Agreed. But the price is attractive, compared to other AVs, only if you have multiple machines at Home.

In contrast the Corporate version is as "cheap as chips".

 

its the cheapest, even cheaper than drweb (unless you migrate to )

but like you said, its a multi user licence.

 

Changelog of new version now up .

Includes a new bug-feature;