The Symantec/Norton Thread.

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Mayahana, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,649
    Location:
    USA
    I just double checked. I guess it's only been 9 years.
     
  2. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    Visually you are half correct, but internally the product is very different from the initial version 22, along the years Norton team made those notable changes:

    1- New engine called Symantec Data Scanner.

    https://community.norton.com/en/blo...roducing-symantec-data-scanner-sds-technology

    2 - A new generic anti-exploit module called Proactive Exploit Protection:

    https://community.norton.com/en/blo...ents/introducing-proactive-exploit-protection

    3 - A new module that block scripts and macros.

    4 - A new module called "Data Protector" that acts as a last resource layer against ransomware.

    5- New heuristics and AI protection with less false positives.

    6- Better behavior blocker, performance and continuous bug fixes.

    7 - Software module updater (best in class for security solutions).

    8 - Better IPS module and agnostic browser protection along with a better Norton Safe Web extension.


    Nowadays Norton is pretty good, it is a top tier solution along Kaspersky, Bitdefender, ESET and so on.

    Ps: The engine changes and upgrades are pretty interesting too, example (yes, those are ported to Norton):

    https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en...rotect-against-living-off-the-land-tools.html
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2023
  3. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,649
    Location:
    USA
    They really should bump the version number and refresh the UI a bit.
     
  4. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,508
    Ahh ok only 9 years. Regardless, that GUI needs updating for sure.
     
  5. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,649
    Location:
    USA
    It does. Hurts my eyes to look at all of that white and yellow.
     
  6. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    Yeah, I agree with that, it doesnt make a good impression for the majority of users because it seems like that there weren't any improvement in years and this isnt true at all.
     
  7. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    +1.
     
  8. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  9. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  10. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,649
    Location:
    USA
    Looking back through this... I think I see what the version number is. Looks like 22.yy.mm.dd? Probably build date and not release date?
     
  11. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    That's as good a guess as any, but who knows with Norton. As you know, they don't like sharing too much information.
     
  12. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  13. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  14. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.