Are any anti-malware or HIPS softwares evaluated anywhere else? It seems that Matousec's testing methodology is severely limited, and the effectiveness of many of these programs in the real-world is suspect. How can so many people justify spending money on, for instance, an anti-keylogging software with unproven effectiveness? This would be like hiring a security guard based on their own personal statement alone. It doesn't make sense. If no one is properly testing these softwares, then why doesn't an expert from this forum take up the task? Or is it possible that this market is too small, scam-ridden, and unprofessional to be worth benchmarking in the first place?