PC-Welt FireWall tests

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by aigle, Apr 17, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    10,830
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
    Has this been discussed here? I need the URL for these tests. ZA beated CFP in these tets.
     
  2. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,713
    Location:
    NL
  3. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    10,830
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
    Thanks but I don,t find this detaiul here.

     
  4. Edwin024

    Edwin024 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Posts:
    1,000
    I looked at the site and it seems that PCWelt stopped the website in 2006 when it comes to firewalls :)
     
  5. tuatara

    tuatara Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Posts:
    772
    That is correct, the test covers 7 pages of their magazine.
    And the test were done together with av-test.de (aka av-test.org).

    Personally i think that the tests were made by av-test.org only, and pc-welt puts it on paper.

    Their conclusion (not my) was:

    1st place: Zone Alarm 7.0
    2: Comodo FW Professional 3.0
    3: Sunbelt personal Firewall 4.5
    4: Ashampoo Firewall 1.2
    5: Pc tools Firewall plus 3.0
    6: Softperfect personal Firewall 1.4.1
    7: Microsoft Vista Firewall

    Found differences between ZA en Co:

    Item ZoneAlarm Comodo
    create rules autom no yes
    mail attachment filter yes no
    blocks programs wth stolen access rights yes no
    blocks active trojans (out of 10) 10 8

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Although German is not my native tongue (neither is English) i have a subscription on this magazine.
    Their reviews in most cases have different test results that their English counterparts, but are near my personal opinion just as good.

    For the record, these results are not the same as my personal finding in testing personal firewalls.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2008
  6. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,008
    Than what does it mean?
    Did PC Welt lie about the results of the tests?
    I wouldn't trust it too much if they don't give details on which methods/trojans they used in the tests.
    Egemen said that don't take them seriously unless they publish their results and test tools. ZoneAlarm can not compete with CFP 3 in terms of malware behavior detection and blocking.
     
  7. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,008
    What is the exact date and year of this number of PC Welt?
     
  8. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    824
    Location:
    Austria
    Same here, they tested the PC Tools Firewall with their portscanner and found port 135 and 445 open.

    I tested the PC Tools Firewall Plus at GRC (first 1056 ports) and all ports were stealth, at PC Flank Port 135 and 445 were stealth, too.
    Everything with default settings in PC Tools Firewall, no single change.

    Then I tested my Router without any Firewall installed (Windows Firewall disabled) and all Ports were closed, except for port 135 (stealth).

    So port 135 might be theoretically open at their test, but why is port 445 open, too.
    I assume they did their portscans in an LAN enviroment, but in their result table they only tell you "blocks portscans"...

    But I am afraid, that most will misinterpret this as portscans from the internet.

    Cheers
     
  9. Smokey

    Smokey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2002
    Posts:
    1,513
    Location:
    Annie's Pub
  10. pitzelberger

    pitzelberger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Posts:
    56
    it is in 5/2008, so it is actually quite new!

    as written in post #3 (aigle):
    "The PC-Welt Crew have bypassed the Comodo Firewall with a verry old Trick. They have stolen the Access Rights from a Allowed Programm (for example IE) and go with a New Application with the stolen rights online."
     
  11. Smokey

    Smokey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2002
    Posts:
    1,513
    Location:
    Annie's Pub

    Attached Files:

    • pcw1.jpg
      pcw1.jpg
      File size:
      36.3 KB
      Views:
      971
  12. pitzelberger

    pitzelberger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Posts:
    56
  13. tuatara

    tuatara Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Posts:
    772
    Exactly , the test was done again for the most recent monthly magazine, that came out this month (number 5 for 2008 )
     
  14. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,008
    Tuatara could you please send the scans of their testing methods in the magazine, do you know what testing methods they used?
    Did they use in Comodo Firewall Pro 3.0.21.309 custom Policy Mode, Paranoid Mode Very High frequency alert, Image execution Agressive?

    Against what active Trojans CFP 3.0 failed and ZA blocked all 10 of them?
    I'm still quite suspicious because CFP 3.0 is an anti-malware, HIPS product, ZoneAalarm freeware isn't.
     
  15. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,008

    Could you please send the scans of their testing methods in the magazine, do you know what testing methods they used?
    Did they use in Comodo Firewall Pro 3.0.21.329 custom Policy Mode, Paranoid Mode Very High frequency alert, Image execution Agressive?

    Against what active Trojans CFP 3.0 failed and ZA blocked all 10 of them?
    I'm still quite suspicious because CFP 3.0 is an anti-malware, HIPS product, ZoneAalarm freeware isn't.

    And what about these stolen rights?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.