NovaShield HIPS

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Rasheed187, Mar 5, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    And the Management Team here
     
  2. Perman

    Perman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2,161
    Hi,

    Thanks for those screen shots.

    Are there some differences between NovaShield and AntiBot(or PRSC) ?

    It seems to me that it may be a mirror image of PRSC that I am using.
     
  3. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    trjam, are you representing them?

    Lot of discussion here, but no test, so.....

    I don't get it, or I missed something. I downloaded and installed it. Smooth install, and once up it told me my system was clean, Novashield was operating, and my system was protected. Ran Killdisk, one other virus that infected the system, and another POV that took down the system.

    As far as I can see the only thing on Novashield that worked was it's nag screen. On all three of the malware samples I ran, Fprot wouldn't have let me extract them, wouldn't let me run them. OA,SSM and Prosecurity all protested over the place, and blocked them unless I allowed. Sandboxie and online armor's Run Safer protected the system. Actually so did DefenseWall.

    For this test, I put both Prosecurity and OA in learning mode, so Novashield was on it's own. Ran all three tests. Not a peep out of Novashield, nothing, and each piece of malware had it's way with the machine.

    Pete
     
  4. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Ah, not any more.:doubt:
     
  5. Espresso

    Espresso Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Posts:
    976
    Maybe it's telling that the release date is April 1. ;)
     
  6. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Not a very good start when your primary business is defense. On the other side at least it is silent :)
     
  7. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    I would not test a behav. blocker with leaktests, PoCs or destructive malware. I would test it with exploits, trojans, bots and worms.
     
  8. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    to me it was Antibot all over again.
     
  9. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I didn't test it with leak tests, but if it the logic of not testing with destructive malware, is a puzzlement. If it won't stop that, what on earth good is it? Besides read the website. Wonderful new technology that protects the computer from new and unknown threats.
     
  10. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    Killdisk is not a new or unknown threat. NovaShield only works when the threat is new or unknown. :D :rolleyes:
     
  11. kinwolf

    kinwolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Posts:
    271
    3 process that used 100 megs of memory + it kept crashing because it couldn't contact it's licence server, even though I used the 60 day trial...

    It's gone from my computer.
     
  12. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    ROFL. You may be right.
     
  13. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Crimeware (malware which pursue financial gain) :)
    NAB/PRSC and Threatfire also failed with destructive malware and some PoCs. Gather some USB worms, PSW trojans, exploits, backdoors, spambots, rogue scanners and the like and retest it.
     
  14. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Naw. Don't see the point. OA with Runsafer, Prosecurity, SSM and Sandboxie handle it all. Why bother with something that doesn't. Certainly doesn't match the claims, in my opinion.

    Pete
     
  15. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    What I am rying to figure out is, how does it know what the new threat is, if it doesnt know what the old one was.o_O
     
  16. Perman

    Perman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2,161
    Hi,

    One of the wilders' members , who has done test of Manutu versus Four Kings of Virus, has conducted the same test. And he reported back: NovaShield has FAILED all FOUR.

    Using this test result as a yardstick, then NovaShiled Has very long way to hop.
     
  17. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    But they seem to have made enough money even until now by the grants. I wonder how come they are eligible for such grants.
     
  18. Chuck57

    Chuck57 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Posts:
    1,770
    Location:
    New Mexico, USA
    That's what Grants are all about it the United States. They've given out grants to study why children play, to study the origin of the Hatfield-McCoy feud (when anybody in that area could tell you), and other intelligent things. Why not to develop software that doesn't work?
     
  19. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Certainly your setup has no place for a behav. blocker. I thought that you were testing it for fun.
     
  20. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I was testing it for fun, and it failed.
     
  21. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I have also tested this app and I have to agree, the apps looks crappy on first sight. It could spot some malware, but most of the time it stayed completely silent, what a joke. Looks like it´s ridiculously far behind on tools like ThreatFire and these guys are actually charging money for this crap, very disappointing :cautious:, but I don´t like behavior blockers anyway.

    It would have been much more clear if you had put post #24 inside qoute tags.
     
  22. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    point taken.:doubt:
     
  23. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Posts:
    3,238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
  24. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.