NOD32 V2 (Installed components - versions)

Why Do I have "Internet Support Version: 2.000.8" ?

"Base Version" is 2.000.9 & "Standard Component Version" is also 2.000.9.

Why I ask is because someone said "Internet Support Version" is at 2.000.9 now. I dunno, are you all having 2.000.9? Maybe it's because I have IMON disabled while updating or something?

 

This is correct

NOD32 Antivirus System information
Virus signature database version: 1.770 (20040521)
Dated: Friday, 21 May 2004
Virus signature database build: 4566

Information on other scanner support parts
Advanced heuristics module version: 1.007 (20040309)
Advanced heuristics module build: 1053
Internet filter version: 1.001 (20031104)
Internet filter build: 1012
Archive support module version: 1.014 (2004040
Archive support module build version: 1088

Information on installed components
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 - Base
Version: 2.000.9
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 - Internet support
Version: 2.000.8
NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 - Standard component
Version: 2.000.9

Operating system information
Platform: Windows XP
Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Version of common control components: 5.82.2800
RAM: 496 MB
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2813 MHz)

Cheers

 

Many thanks Ronjor, I wonder why it doesn't automatically up date to that version

I'll download the latest and manually install

Cheers

 

Many thanks Ronjor from me too !!!!!

Several months ago I started here at the NOD32-forum the following thread, hoping that it would have been made "sticky" as a service to the NOD32-users and that the many Eset mods here would do the maintenance of it:
https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=22205

 

It's been mentioned here before that one can redownload the program to have all the latest program components, but I still don't see why the Internet Support program component apparently for some of us did not update through the NOD updater as other components did. Perhaps I'm missing something?

 

NOD32 Antivirus System information
Virus signature database version: 1.770 (20040521)
Dated: Friday, May 21, 2004
Virus signature database build: 4565

Information on other scanner support parts
Advanced heuristics module version: 1.007 (20040309)
Advanced heuristics module build: 1053
Archive support module version: 1.014 (2004040
Archive support module build version: 1088

Information on installed components
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Base
Version: 2.000.6
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Internet support
Version: 2.000.6
NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP - Standard component
Version: 2.000.6

Operating system information
Platform: Windows XP
Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Version of common control components: 5.82.2800
RAM: 512 MB
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ (1394 MHz)



Why doesnt mine have .9 of the versions as everyone else's does, i have the latest download from their site.. can anyone offer suggestions maybe :S

Note: im using the trial version, but that shouldnt make a difference
thanks

 

Hi Sig,

That's exactly why I wanted that thread (which I started several months ago) to be sticky.
ESET could have informed ALL NOD32 users in that thread.

I really hope that we are not going back to those days when there was an Eset-dedicated-forum at Becky's.
This is most certainly NOT meant to blame the fine Becky's forum !!!

I am now going to send an email to Anton, Marcos and Paul !
Things have to improve right now here !!!!!
Eset has a dedicated forum here, and they most definitely has to take their custumers/clients seriously.

Regards, FanJ.

 

Yup a friend of mine - a licensed user - just confirmed this: he downloaded n installed the latest version after having uninstalled his current setup (personally I dunno why he bothered, heh) and now he's got Internet 2.000.9

Now it seems there's a prob: now according to him the install file that users download is always an SFX-RAR archive with AUTHENTICITY VERIFICATION.

BUT in this case, he told me there wuz NO authenticity verification in the new file. He only noticed that cos' he wuz used to seeing the authenticity info in the Winrar window when opening the files, and this time he didn't see it.

I told him to revert back 2 the previous version n inform this forum about the potential security risk of this new download but he doesn't seem to bother!!!!!! So I thought I might as well inform Nod32 users myself


So to all Nod32 users: the latest setup file has no authenticity verification so download n install it at yur own risk.....

 

Well, all I can say is that I downloaded the latest version the last time this was discussed here so I would I get 2.09, but I did NOT get it. I still got 2.08. So, don't waste your time. It doesn't really matter to me because I don't use IMON, but I still wanted to have the latest version since it is installed whether I use it or not.

 

So the Internet support component is only for IMON? If that's the case I don't care since I'm not using IMON.

 

Well, FanJ, I haven't been sufficiently motivated to redownload the app just to see if I'd get the updated component. And I also recall as Mele said that her redownload resulted in the same version she had before. Still, since the issue was raised again in this thread I' thought I'd mention my puzzlement.

Ainur: what your friend said confuses me...a RAR file? I've not encountered that. This is what's available at the USA site: http://www.nod32.com/download/download.htm

 

The only difference in v. 2.000.9 of the Internet support module is a compatibility fix. Therefore, we provided fixed imon.dll to those having that problem and updated the installer on our web site. A new beta version 2.000.10 will be available some time soon and later as an automatic update of program components.

 

Ah, thanks for the clarification Marcos.

 

THAT'S what it was! Now, I remember. Gee, I hate getting older...my memory just isn't what it used to be. Yes, Marcos...thanks for jogging my memory. How I could forget all those posts regarding that compatibility problem and Eset providing a fix in the form of 2.000.9 for those folks....

 

Hi Marcos !

Thanks for the info !!!

My apologies to you and everyone at ESET for my strong words.
I should not have posted them !
Again: sorry !

Best regards, Jan.

PS: Thanks also to Anton. I've got a very kind email from him.