New Antiexecutable: NoVirusThanks EXE Radar Pro

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by sg09, Jun 3, 2011.

  1. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I do believe that older versions did indeed use less CPU time, I think it was about 1 to 2%. But I'm not getting to see anything near 20% like you do, so there's definitely something wrong on your system. What other security tools are you using? Personally I can live with 5%, and it also does not affect the speed of my PC.
     
  2. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    I went back and tried this latest version in a snapshot with no security software other than ERP itself with the same results.
     
  3. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Yes, I forgot you already mentioned this, that's weird indeed. Sometimes these problems are hard to troubleshoot, I was having problems with the HMPA + SBIE combo while others don't have any issues at all, it's so weird and a bit frustrating. BTW, you might want to use Process Monitor to see what ERP is up to, perhaps you will get a clue.

    https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx
    http://www.howtogeek.com/school/sysinternals-pro/lesson4/all/
     
  4. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Hello,

    I was thinking back and there was one other instance where I had seen high CPU usage during the beta versions for ERP 3.1. I had asked about it and Andreas had replied:
    I wonder if Andreas has added something again for testing purposes and this may be the reason I am seeing this high CPU usage. I guess I will have to wait to hear from Andreas for a definitive answer. In the meantime, the build from Jan. 25 is running perfectly here.
     
  5. newguytosecurity

    newguytosecurity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2015
    Posts:
    4
    Thanks for the quick reply Rasheed187, I figured it is only a false positive. Was kind of odd that the build from Post #4287 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_20022015_BUILD2.exe was flagged buy ESET Smart Security.

    But the other .exe's that i have downloaded before, never got flagged.
    Post #4096 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_16012015_BUILD3.exe
    Post #4107 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_16012015_BUILD4.exe
    Post #4109 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_16012015_BUILD5.exe (blank process fix)
    Post #4121 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_17012015_BUILD1.exe (x86 OS fix)
    Post #4154 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_17012015_BUILD1.exe (cautious build)
    Post #4207 EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_25012015_BUILD1.exe (log only blocked events fix)

    Thanks again for the response.
     
  6. kardokristal

    kardokristal Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Posts:
    1,091
    Location:
    Estonia
    Hello Andreas,

    One user from another forum reported that latest Beta is not signed and got alert from Glasswire during the update process. I'll quote it for you.
    Regards,
    Kardo
     
  7. newguytosecurity

    newguytosecurity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2015
    Posts:
    4
    So perhaps i may not be alone, is it possible because a .exe is not signed and that's why my ESET flagged it?
    Sorry for the non tech savvy questions, i just want to make sure/learn about all this.
     
  8. novirusthanks

    novirusthanks Developer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Posts:
    1,359
    Location:
    Italy
    Released a new beta build:
    http://downloads.novirusthanks.org/files/EXERadar_Pro_x86_x64_v3.1_22022015_BUILD2.exe

    * Fixed Stealth Mode enable/disable
    * When installing ERP a system restore point is automatically created
    * Minor fixes and optimizations

    @kardokristal @newguytosecurity

    Thanks for reporting this issue, I just forgot to sign the PE files (my bad) :)

    Try this new build, all files are signed now.

    @puff-m-d

    Try this new beta build, it should have decreased the CPU usage in the service.

    @MikeMT

    Thanks a lot for your feedback :)

    It should be fixed in this new beta build, please let me know if it works fine for you.
     
  9. kardokristal

    kardokristal Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Posts:
    1,091
    Location:
    Estonia
    @novirusthanks Thank you for the feedback and new release! :)

    I quoted your answer to another user on another forum.

    Regards,
    Kardo
     
  10. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Hello Andreas,

    I get the following error when trying to install on a Windows 8.1.3 Pro 64-bit system:
    2015.02.22_13h13m11s_002_.png
     
  11. MikeMT

    MikeMT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Posts:
    63
    Location:
    Malta
    @puff-m-d ... You beat me to it as I too have the same issue.

    Previous beta was uninstalled completely followed by a reboot. Clearing all leftover files / folders & registry entries did not assist either.

    OS Win 8.1.3 X64
     
  12. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,814
    Location:
    .
    Same issue as puff-m-d and MikeMT I got with this beta.
     
  13. newguytosecurity

    newguytosecurity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2015
    Posts:
    4
    Thanks for the quick response and for the new update novirusthanks.
    The download was NOT flagged by ESET.
    Everything so far is running smoothly. Thanks again. :)
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2015
  14. MikeMT

    MikeMT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Posts:
    63
    Location:
    Malta
    Without having to restore back from a system drive image, the prior beta build re -installs & all saved settings import OK
     
  15. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    I get this error on my Win 8.1 64 bit system. When installing


    ScreenHunter_02 Feb. 22 12.57.jpg
     
  16. novirusthanks

    novirusthanks Developer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Posts:
    1,359
    Location:
    Italy
  17. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,814
    Location:
    .
    Well done!!! Thanks NVT, now ERP service is below 2%... Nice!!!
     
  18. MikeMT

    MikeMT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Posts:
    63
    Location:
    Malta
    @novirusthanks ..Cheers & it installed along with prior settings imported with no probs.

    Thank you for the prompt response & resolution.
     
  19. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Hello Andreas,

    ERP installed with no issues and CPU usage is now back to normal. Thanks :thumb: !!!

    As to the auto-creation of a system restore point on install, I do not use system restore and have it disabled. Perhaps this caused the error on the previous build's failed install? You probably already figured that out hence the reason you removed it, but thought that I would mention that I do not use it and have it disabled (just in case)...
     
  20. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    THis build made it almost to the end of install but gave this error msg this time.
    ScreenHunter_02 Feb. 22 13.49.jpg
     
  21. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    does it matter if I am trying to install this in a sandbox like program such as QuiteZone?
     
  22. novirusthanks

    novirusthanks Developer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Posts:
    1,359
    Location:
    Italy
    @boredog

    Do you have other security software that may block ERPSvc.exe from loading nvterp.sys driver ?

    @puff-m-d

    Yes, the error message you noticed was showed because you have restore point disabled. Thanks for the additional information :)
     
  23. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    I have QuiteZone , Norton 2015 Malwarebytes Antimalware Pre and Malwarbytes Antiexploit Pre installed.
     
  24. novirusthanks

    novirusthanks Developer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    Posts:
    1,359
    Location:
    Italy
    @boredog

    Yes, if QuiteZone blocks loading of kernel-mode drivers of sandboxed programs (it should) then you should install ERP outside the sandbox.
     
  25. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    All I know about QuiteZone is anything done on my computer and any attached drives such as USB stick or even USb hard drives , when enabled all changes get erased on reboot. I don't know if it blocks driver install persay but maybe only delets the install aftrer reboot?
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.