New Anti-Phishing Test-AV Comparatives-August 2013

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by c2d, Aug 14, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,102
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    i can say i have recently seen eset blocking a TON of stuff web page wise and mostly legit with just a couple fp's. way more than i ever have before which is awesome. but i was surprised to see it #1 its been a while since ive seen my old fav at the #1 spot lol. nice job!! and great job forticlient for a free av its one of the best i have seen i just wish for more options and settings so i could eliminate it auto delete at times etc. and mcafee well its been scoring good lately but you still until proven in my own eyes have to pay me a lot of $$ to run it on my own pc's lol
     
  2. mattdocs12345

    mattdocs12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Posts:
    1,892
    Location:
    US
    Yup. Us Forticlient users got to stick together. We are endanger specie here on Wilders. Congrats Forti!!!

    Hmmm... Hasn't happened to me in the new version. It automatically puts a file into a quarantine and then gives you an option to put it back in the main Virus window.
     
  3. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    Congrats to the top scorers. Personally had higher expectations from EAM but its still good. :D
     
  4. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,115
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Removed Off Topic Posts. Let's Focus On The Subject: New Anti-Phishing Test-AV Comparatives-August 2013. Thank you.
     
  5. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    A legitimate website being turned into a phishing website is less likely than a legitimate website serving malicious content (i.e. through an ad provider).

    This happens a lot more often than one would think. I am a very cautious browser (I barely go anywhere, frankly) but even just yesterday, Photobucket attempted to infect me through a malicious ad which we blocked.
     
  6. AVusah

    AVusah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2012
    Posts:
    274
    What exactly did the malicious ad attempt to do, and was the phishing filter the one that blocked it?
     
  7. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    It was a driveby infection. I think for most AVs, the phishing filter is the same as the overall malicious website filter.
     
  8. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Not in ESET's case, they categories websites based upon what was found, malware site, phisingsite, or potentially harmful website etc...

    And if it's not block totally by the URL or IP blocker, it's a good chance the http scanner would have detected it while scanning the website content. I've seen it block threats in ads on websites several times.

    But as you say, most vendors probably just show "malware found on blahblah.com access denied" or only "malware site". more or less :)
     
  9. silverfox99

    silverfox99 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Posts:
    204
    Yeah, think that is broadly how McAfee works - siteadvisor (built-in with McIS) usually does quite well in phishing tests which come around infrequently (annual on AV-C?). I have also seen siteadvisor block adverts and inform user that it is blocking content on the page which has been flagged as 'malicious', whilst not blocking the whole site.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.