MRG ongoing tests

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by CloneRanger, Sep 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    i said possibly, doesnt mean it will, but with some systems it might, and no matter how u look at it, its gunna take a lot more bandwidth to scan a whole system compared to only critical system areas
     
  2. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,290
    True but still there would be an increase, plus it would take longer for HMP to finish scans (keep in mind one of HMP's strong points is it's blazing scan times).
     
  3. Zimzi

    Zimzi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Posts:
    289

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 20, 2010
  4. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    nice comparation;) :thumb:
     
  5. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
  6. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    thanks aigle:thumb:
     
  7. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    WOW, EAM never fails!! :D :thumb: :thumb: Top Notch AV
     
  8. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Sure it does fail, not in these tests though.:)
     
  9. progress

    progress Guest

    Well done Panda :thumb:
     
  10. Boyfriend

    Boyfriend Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Posts:
    1,070
    Location:
    Pakistan
    DefenseWall (HIPS/Personal Firewall) rocks too, a very lightweight and effective policy based HIPS [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2010
  11. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Too bad it isn't working that well with Kaspersky
     
  12. Boyfriend

    Boyfriend Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Posts:
    1,070
    Location:
    Pakistan
    It is working very well for me. Check my security setup. What problem/error it shows on your system?
     
  13. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Nice to see something with Vipre in it. Good result too,
     
  14. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,290
    VIPRE doing pretty well so far. One of the top ranked in these tests, I've seen it failing 3 or 4 time tho... But superb performance overall. :thumb:
    Blue Point Security really impressive. :eek: I personally had never heard of it before... But will be for sure my second option after my VIPRE subscription expires...
     
  15. SIR****TMG

    SIR****TMG Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    833
    Inpressive Indeed :thumb:
     
  16. forty

    forty Guest

    I've used Blue Point Security for about three months and would be lost without it. These tests are invaluable for common users like me who don't have a clue about testing on there own.Thanks to MRG!
     
  17. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    because it's white list based i think.
     
  18. Boyfriend

    Boyfriend Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Posts:
    1,070
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Blue Point Security is combinations of whitelist + blacklist (cloud based) techniques.
     
  19. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Must admit I haven't tried 3.08 yet. Tried previous versions and it didn't do it for me. :(
     
  20. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    KIS already have a sandbox. Is it not good enough?
     
  21. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    And what exactly was wrong?
     
  22. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    There were several errors. My machine freezes and both Kaspersky as well as Defensewall weren't working properly.
     
  23. Rampastein

    Rampastein Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Posts:
    290
    For me the sandbox combined with it's HIPS has been enough, so I think DW with KIS is a bit overkill. But well, probably they just want to be really sure that they'll never get infected. The KIS sandbox doesn't also have many adjustable settings, maybe another reason to use DW with it.
     
  24. LODBROK

    LODBROK Guest

    Looks like efforts have slowed down a bit over there at MRG's latest variant tests.

    After almost two months it's boiled down to...
    • Fails never.
    • Fails hardly ever.
    • Fails mostly.
    • Fails always.
    :isay:

    Hope they're working on something to make it interesting again.
     
  25. Kyle1420

    Kyle1420 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Posts:
    490
    Immunet Protect Plus has done really well this month :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.