Emsisoft Online Armor 6.0 is out!

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by Mops21, Oct 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

  2. bonedriven

    bonedriven Registered Member

  3. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Just tried the COMODO Leak Test against this with AppGuard disabled and it got 100%. That leak test tried to do some crazy stuff judging my some of the pop-ups, but OA stopped them all!
  4. chris1341

    chris1341 Guest

    It passes them all just on it's own without AppGuard if you 'run safer'. Try some screen capture POCs though (SpyShelter ones for example). Screen capture on x 64 is OA's Achilles Heel IMO, although I realise it would likely have blocked execution earlier in the chain. Comodo, PFW and OP do much better on screen capture POCs though so room for improvement I think.
  5. Netherlands

    Netherlands Registered Member

    Indeed the 64-bit protection is weak but they show the limitations on there website:

    • Self protection does not work
    • Keylogger protection is not yet implemented
    • Many advanced-mode capabilities are disabled
    • Webshield and Mail Shield only filter 32-bit processes

  6. siketa

    siketa Registered Member

  7. m0unds

    m0unds Registered Member

    there you go.
  8. chris1341

    chris1341 Guest

    m0unds, not sure where the quote came from but it's not accurate IME. Screen capture protection plus other finer settings are just not available in OA x 64.

    I'm sure, though can't find it, when 4.5 was released Emsisoft rep stated you cannot stop applications controlling the windows of other apps on x 64 so screen capture protection was impossible. Maybe others are using user level hooks Emsisoft (quite rightly) believe are not strong enough to achieve this but they still perform better than OA in these POCs at least.

    For example of Emsisoft confirmation of x 64 limitations see here http://www.emsisoft.com/en/info/oa/Programs.shtml. Also most screen capture POC on x 64 fail.

    I think Emsisoft are a great company with brilliant customer support and OA a top application but some things I really like in the product aren't as strong on x 64 as they are on x 32.

  9. m0unds

    m0unds Registered Member

    it came from the link in the post i quoted. emsisoft claiming full functionality on x64. there's a wacky disparity of claims in their documentation depending on where you look; the online armor website (non-emsisoft site) says lots of things are hobbled on x64, but that help doc (the one you linked) says only a handful of things are. couple that with the aforementioned statement of full functionality on emsisoft's product page, and it's hard to know what works and what doesn't.

    http://i.imgur.com/QKbkX.png - here's a screenshot if you don't feel like clicking on the link i quoted and searching for x64
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2013
  10. Blues7

    Blues7 Registered Member

    The online manual probably is a good starting place for info on the current builds...otherwise I'd submit a request to their tech support folks They're very responsive in my experience.

  11. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Or you guys could ask Emsisoft in the EAM thread.
  12. m0unds

    m0unds Registered Member

    like i said though, their current marketing says one thing, help docs say something else. if i cared enough to find out, i'd probably just ask via a support request or on their forums. i was purely mentioning that they're claiming OA 6 is fully functional on x64 platforms.

    *EDIT* curiosity got the better of me, and I asked emsisoft. I was told that the product page (http://www.emsisoft.com/en/software/oa/) is the most accurate representation of the protection status of OA, and that it's fully functional on x64 versions of windows.
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013
  13. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    I recently installed Online Armor Free on Windows 7 x86 and I'm seeing consistent high CPU usage around 50%. Is this a known problem and is there a solution?
  14. Bigabe

    Bigabe Registered Member

    No this isn't normal. OA has such a high CPU usage? After installing it is in learning mode, so maybe it is just checking out your processes?
  15. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    My understanding is OA is only briefly in learning mode when it starts for the first time and that's clearly indicated on the screen. After that it switches to normal filtering and that's when I saw the high CPU usage. I understand it's not "normal", but it's not unheard of either. A Google search shows a number of threads where people have talked about it.
  16. Bigabe

    Bigabe Registered Member

    Maybe there is a conflict with another security tool of yours? Do you use any other HIPS or firewall? You are right about learning mode.
    OA is causing some boot delay, about 2 secs from cold boot, but I didn't notice any other high activity.

    Check if you are stuck in some kind of update routine? I had something like that with Outpost one time.
    Maybe you clicked on the wrong button during installation and you are now hindering some OS processes to work properly?
  17. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    The only resident security app I use is Webroot SecureAnywhere. Right now I have the Windows Firewall turned on, but it was off when OA was installed.
  18. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    OA is designed to turn off Windows Firewall at install.

    If you uninstall OA it turns Windows Firewall back on.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.