Cryptosoftware indicates illegal use

Discussion in 'privacy general' started by meneer, May 25, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. meneer

    meneer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Posts:
    1,132
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    If you have cryptosoftware, it might indicate that you perform illegal activities...
    cnet news.com article
     
  2. trickyricky

    trickyricky Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Posts:
    475
    Location:
    London, UK
    Possibly, in the same way that owning a carving-knife might indicate the same. Or a car, anything made of glass, matches, garden tools...

    Let's all turn ourselves in since we're obviously all intent on performing illegal activities. Well, we MIGHT be, and that's good enough.

    Isn't it?
     
  3. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    Since the case was brought and decided strictly upon evidence presented by the minor in question, you really have to wonder why the encryption software was brought into the picture at all.

    It's not a good precedent to see being set (in spite of the fact that I have no sympathy for child pornographer's whatsoever, and am glad the indidvidual in question was found guilty and will be punished) given the fact that things are already too "loose" these days regarding what is being considered "just cause" for various options like monitoring, searching and planting keyloggers.

    You can count on the fact that this "precedent" will be used for even more "secret" ISP monitoring of individuals accounts, more "secret" searches of individuals homes and more "secret" gag orders regarding investigations of individuals - all "based" simply on the fact that said individual utilizes an encryption program.

    The government's really "big" on quasi-legalities. Pete
     
  4. Vikorr

    Vikorr Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Posts:
    662
    In conjunction with the actual charge brought against him, the encryption software should certainly have been included IF they found encrypted files on his computer...however the report indicates that no encrypted files were brought up in the court hearing...which makes the inclusion of the encryption software somewhat prejudical.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.