COMODO Internet Security 5.x Thread

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Mops21, Jul 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cruelsister

    cruelsister Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,653
    Location:
    Paris
    A new version of Ransomware showed up earlier today. Amazingly enough Commodo AV picked it up! D+/Sandbox stops these things cold, so no worries anyway but it is nice to see the defs up to date.
     
  2. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    What I meant is that I've seen the whitelist grow a ton. I rarely get notifications and if I do I submit it to Comodo.


    Mhm. I ran a few very new pieces of malware last night that were sandboxed but not picked up by the cloud AV. All were broken and not a single infection made it onto my computer.
     
  3. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    thats good hungryman:thumb:
     
  4. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Yup.

    What I want to do is see if legitimate apps run. Sandboxing is useless if it breaks everything (at least for me...) but if it's just breaking malware than that's fine =p though I'd prefer the malware runs and is simply restricted.
     
  5. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    exactly:thumb:
     
  6. CogitoTesting

    CogitoTesting Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Posts:
    901
    Location:
    Sea of Tranquility, Luna
    So jmonge why is it you are not running CIS then?

    Thanks.
     
  7. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    i am considering to run it again;)
     
  8. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Seems like you're already covered in terms of antiviruses. At this point if you want to add security I'd go for Defense+.
     
  9. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,342
    Location:
    USA
    You don't need it, you got OA++ :D
     
  10. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Defense+ is so ridiculously lightweight and effective it should really be a part of any security setup. Unless of course that setup includes other virtualization software, then it's not so necessary.
     
  11. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    :thumb: :thumb: OA++ and comodo D+ is very good:thumb: :thumb:
     
  12. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,342
    Location:
    USA
    Noooooo. Burnt bacon, don't do it J :D
     
  13. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
  14. luciddream

    luciddream Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Posts:
    2,545
    That's the impasse we're at here though... there is no noise for me. I've had maybe a half dozen popups in the past year. And this is with no whitelist at all, since I deleted my vendor.n file.

    I wonder what people are doing to make it noisy?... perpetually changing their setups, installing & uninstalling things all day?
     
  15. cruelsister

    cruelsister Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,653
    Location:
    Paris
    I'll bet some are putting D+ in Paranoid Mode. That certainly should increase the popups!
     
  16. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Well autosandboxing also counts as a popup I assume. So you'll get one of those quite often.

    As for the Defense+ HIPS without sandboxing... I've gotten that a single time in all of the time I've used Comodo.
     
  17. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    I'm running Defense+ in Safe Mode using the vendor whitelist and the only popups I see are when I install something.
     
  18. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,342
    Location:
    USA
    Who knows cuz I'm not seeing it. I barely get popups.
     
  19. mhl6493

    mhl6493 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Posts:
    230
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Same here. Can't remember the last popup I got.
     
  20. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    3,351
    Location:
    Europe, UE citizen

    On the contrary, I use Defense+ without the sandbox.The sandbox is a good function from Comodo to make easy for " common " users, but I prefer to check and to decide by myself what allow in my system.
     
  21. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    The sandbox makes it incredibly easy to do that since it allows a "sneak preview" of the program.
     
  22. cruelsister

    cruelsister Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,653
    Location:
    Paris
    Blacknight- I strongly suggest that you use the Sandbox. There was a variant of the recent ransomware that was only controlled by sandboxing it. Without it you wouldn't have the chance to decide anything (other than when to restore the image for your trashed computer).
     
  23. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    Does that mean it would have completely bypassed CIS Execution Control so there would have been no alert with a chance to deny execution on launch?
     
  24. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    No. Execution Control just means that before an application is launched CIS gets a chance to do a few thins to it. One of those things is sandboxing.

    Otherwise you're relying on some cloud-based detection methods and those aren't necessarily going to catch it. I believe the ransomware was not caught.
     
  25. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    My experience of the sandbox is that if enabled, Execution Control will run an unknown application in the sandbox. If disabled, Execution Control will function as an anti-executable and display an alert with an option to deny execution before proceeding. Either way, Execution Control is the first step to blocking execution or to allowing execution to continue sandboxed, depending on whether or not the sandbox feature is enabled.

    If Execution Control has been bypassed such that it can't prevent execution at launch then I can't see how it can force the application to run sandboxed or am I missing something here?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.