CFP Defence+ questions/ help?

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by aigle, Feb 6, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    If you're using full Defense+, the default rules already do warn about executable modification within the root of C. This isn't quite what you're asking, but I think it's maybe what you're perhaps truly concerned about.
     
    MrBrian, Feb 26, 2008
    #26
  2. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Ya, i had noticed that too.
     
    aigle, Feb 26, 2008
    #27
  3. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I just wondered, did you get these ideas from SSM? And I think you can not even do this in SSM, btw. Also, this thread should be moved to the "other anti malware" section IMO.
     
    Rasheed187, Feb 26, 2008
    #28
  4. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    First one from EQS, it marks IE cache folder like this.
    Second one is actually not corect. I mean to say:An parent executable abc.exe allowed to execute ANY CHILD.

    That,s pretty common in HIPS.
     
    aigle, Feb 26, 2008
    #29
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...