Australian vs Swedish versions

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 1 Forum' started by Carl, Feb 3, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Carl

    Carl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Posts:
    2
    I've noticed that the Australian version is newer than the Swedish one, (v1.56 vs v1.356) is that correct?
    So actually I should download and run the Australian version instead?
    Is Eset an Australian Company?
     
  2. anders

    anders Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Posts:
    410
    Apparently, there was a glitch in the update notification, so the Swedish website didn't get the information updated as it should. All versions should be the same, and even if you have an older installation file for NOD32 it will update to the latest version when you download updates using the Control Center.

    No. You can read more about Eset here: http://www.nod32.com.au/nod32/about/about.htm

    Best regards,
    Anders
    EuroSecure
     
  3. Carl

    Carl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Posts:
    2
    I´ve checked US website also, the Australians has the highest version...but you mean they are actually the sameo_O
    NOD32 is anyway a very fast virusprogramme!!
     
  4. anders

    anders Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Posts:
    410
    Where are you reading the version information on the Australian site? URL?

    Here is the update information on the Australian site: http://www.nod32.com.au/nod32/support/info.htm

    Best regards,
    Anders
    EuroSecure
     
  5. mrtwolman

    mrtwolman Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Posts:
    613
  6. rodzilla

    rodzilla Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Posts:
    653
    Location:
    australia
    > If you compare http://www.eset.sk./support/info.htm with http://www.nod32.com.au/nod32/support/info.htm you will have to do conclusion:

    > version numbering differs due some reason (v 1.356 vs. 1.56 etc.), but the viruses added by the respective update are the same.

    > Any comments from ESET ?


    Yeah ... I'd say the guy who looks afer the Australian website is as blind as a bat and can't see his own typos.

    (That's why the same guy uses ">" to quote ... he can't see well enough to read the tiny print in the usual Wilders quotes.)

    Thanks for the heads up ... it has been rectified.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.