Another false positive TDS-3.21 (latest database)

Discussion in 'Trojan Defence Suite' started by halcyon, Feb 9, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. halcyon

    halcyon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Posts:
    373
    Ok, you may remember that I reported Desert Combat 0.5L as being improperly tagged with "Positive identication" by TDS 3.21.

    Well, past weekend Desert Combat 0.7 was released.

    Can you already guess what happens with it? :)

    Yes, exact same false positive identification:

    Alarm: Positive Identification
    Name: (empty)
    File: desert_combat_full-0.7.exe

    You can download the 605 MBYTE DC 0.7 file from:

    http://www.gamershell.com/news_BF1942BDesertCombatBv0.7.shtml

    ...and verify it for yourself.

    Again, if I disable exec protection, disable tds, install DC 0.7, re-start TDS, re-start exec protection, re-scan the folder where I installed DC 0.7, then I get nothing. Not even a single warning.

    Best regards,
    Halcyon
     
  2. Jooske

    Jooske Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    9,713
    Location:
    Netherlands, EU near the sea
    Looks like the explanation Gavin gave, so large!
    How do your other scanners react on this one?
     
  3. halcyon

    halcyon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Posts:
    373
    None of my other scanners react to the aforementioned Desert Combat install files.


    I also agree that it could be due to size.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.