A Zemana test Defeats Comodo.

aigle · May 28, 2008

CoolWebSearch said:

Hi, Fuzzfas.
Here is the thing what really torchers me.
Comodo Firewall Pro 3.0 was tested by AV-test. de group.
Comodo Failed to block 2 Trojans of 10 of them.
CFP 3.0 is supposes to be anti-malware product as they say on Comodo's forums.
ZoneAlarm freeware 7.0 shouldn't be able to compare with CFP's power and effectiveness when it comes to malware detection and blocking and here we see, ZoneAlarm freeware is more effective than CFP 3.0.
The same ZA freeware which has done HORRIBLY ON LEAK-TESTS.
What's the conclusion?
Leak-tests can't match the power and effectiveness of the real malware.
Leak-tests are just theoretical, proof of concept tests that every firewall vendor or HIPS vendor should easily ignore, and take a care about real malware!
These tests support my view that leak-tests are waste of time.
Yes, leak-tests always do their credibility when you test firewalls or HIPS against real malware!
And this is the proof.

And inbound protection
Click to expand...

I am not sure but may be it,s the failure of basic firewall component of CFP. not the HIPS component.

CoolWebSearch · Jun 2, 2008

aigle said:

I am not sure but may be it,s the failure of basic firewall component of CFP. not the HIPS component.
Click to expand...

No, it specifically says that Defense+ was activated!

http://forums.comodo.com/leak_testi...omodo_v3_with_aktivatet_defense-t21770.0.html

LUSHER · Jun 5, 2008

aigle said:

Why not. Post count does not matter at all. He is correct.
Click to expand...

Post count matters if one is saying something bad about the product one is a fan of....

Log in or Sign up

A Zemana test Defeats Comodo.

aigle Registered Member

CoolWebSearch Registered Member

LUSHER Registered Member

Log in or Sign up

A Zemana test Defeats Comodo.

aigle Registered Member

CoolWebSearch Registered Member

LUSHER Registered Member

Useful Searches