Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by Cold Pizza, Jun 23, 2007.
What the heck is this - NSA 7? Is this installed in the latest version of ZA?
May be ZA likes hockey or basket ball
Sorry, no idea what you are talking about...
Need to provide upload image of what you are referring to or a link to be researched otherwise it is just ?
What time is it in Spain?
16:54 but I am not in Italy...
EDIT: Why this question?
What kind of SORRY ANSWER is that? I asked a simple question and YOU come back with a UNCALLED REMARK. Surely YOU don't answer ZA members questions with these type of answers, that's right YOU just remove their posts.
Sorry, if you took it personally...
I have heard all sort of stories about ZA... but this is very original
But please post some more info on this NSA 7 otherwise its like shooting in the dark... a screenshot?
P.S. and thank you very much for your kind words on the ZA forum...
This is where i found this info.
Yes, i could of asked about it at that forum, but most of the time it will be removed or deleted, so what would be the point in asking there.
I just want a simple explanation on NSA 7?
I am a bit lost.... that post does not refers to ZA installing a NSA 7.
The thread is about a false positive by Kaspersky AV that was later fixed.
Can you please explain how you link NSA 7 with ZA?
Go here, does this answer help you?
(NSA 7) is down at the very end of the article.
NO, Thanks anyway. This is some type of SSL Certificate that is required to run in the latest version of ZA. It was mentioned in that thread that i posted for the ZA Forum. Something about updating the certificate.
Thank you for trying to answer my question.
I can't seem to find what you mention on that thread... I can't really understand the link with ZA and NSA 7.
Moreover, the user mentioned that removing NSA 7 has solved the false positive problem.
He should have said instead my ZA is not working... if NSA 7 was needed.
Sorry, I am pretty lost...
LOOK what the poster says.
"Again I believe this is a security certificate rvocation issue"
"Can anyone confirm or reject this?"
Credo ancora che questa sia un'edizione di rvocation di Security Certificate. Può chiunque confermare o rifiutare questo?
NOBODY answered this members question. WHY?
Yes, I see the post but I can't really see that this is a ZA issue.
How can you relate ZA with a certificate revocation?
EDIT: why don't you post there and ask clarification to the user? Like: Is ZA installing NSA 7?
Your quote, "How can you relate ZA with a certificate revocation?". I was NOT the one who originally posted this question at the ZA forum. I saw it and would like to know about it. Since NO ONE wanted to answer that member's question.
I see you like to change the direction of the question that i had asked about. Is this your way of not directly answering questions? It's obvious you don't know the answer or do not want to post it here. I will find the answer with or without your help.
NO, i will not post it at the ZA Forum, as i mentioned prior, it will never see the light of the day, as someone will remove it.
Maybe Philly_Cheez was saying that he removed the file using teh NSA (7 passes) method.
Perhaps someone from ZA should of questioned his remark, instead of blowing it off. Therefore I WOULD NOT be here asking about it
Gee, let's see here...
Feeling better now?
For what it is worth, NSA 7 is an option in CCleaner on the number of bleach or over writes on a disk cleanup. I suppose wiping disk tracks could be considered virus like activity by some?
This clue was in the link provided by coolblueH2O.
When questions are put if you don't know don't try to guess the answer or worse change the subject for fear of bad publicity for a particular vendor.
Either go away and find the facts or remain quiet and hope that the original question will be answered by someone who does know.
Why would fear of possible bad publicity be a concern here unless we are part of the vendor sales force or public relations department.
Gee, that doesn't tell me SQUAT! If you don't have anything helpful to say, then don't say anything at all.
That clue that was given to me by coolblueH2O, was USELESS. I came to this forum for help about something i saw at another forum. It is not my fault that the forum which the original question was posted that NOBODY wanted to answer and when i saw it i wanted to know what it meant. Ever since i asked my quesiton here, everyone wants to start a flaming war about it and speculation that i am on some type of witch hunt, which is not true.
Quote by you, "Either go away and find the facts or remain quiet and hope that the original question will be answered by someone who does know." You have some nerve trying to tell me to go away, perhaps you should go away with your STUPID threads on Firewalls.
What this boils down to, "Everyone thinks they know everything, but really they don't know JACK."
No one has mounted a personal attack on you or anybody else here! I'm agreeing with you and you don't even seem to see it.
If any poster you, me whoever doesn't know the answer we should either find out the facts and or remain quiet. People post what they want and hope it helps others.
FW threads are OT. But, if you find the FW learning threads "Stupid" don't read them. Those threads are Stem's original idea and so let him know how to improve them, before criticizing them!
I hope you can cool down.
The link refers to the OP's question in the thread you listed.
"NSA 7" was used by Philly_Cheez as a solution to do a disk wipe to rid himself of Porn-Dialer.Win32.Agent.aw, which he thought to be an issue. The link I posted shows it isn't an issue.
Which part of "not-a-virus" baffles you?
Just a hint for future reference - play nice, and others will play nice with you.
OK, I'm done feeding the troll.
Right! I've read ALL! your posts Pizza Person, and quickly I understood you to be an Angry Soul Dont YELL! and Mouth Off at other Members, who have tried to figure things out for you, It does no good at all. What I will Add though is that your an Ignorant Individual with No Etiquete at all, Even if you know what the word meant, you wouldnt recognize it till it bit your Ass!
Do you have any friends Probably not as your Mouth probably gets them in all kinds of strife trying to rescue your Ass. As for We knowing JACK! as you put it, I sugest you go Do that to yourself, you Unfortunate Soul
As the original question, (such as it was), has been answered... and the tone of how it was related was so bad, there's no point continuing this thread any further.
Separate names with a comma.