Your opinion of grisoft and their products

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by MalwareDie, Dec 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    I haven't used the antivirus in a long time.It was easy to use and light though.
    AVG AS was a great program when it was Ewido.
    So Grisoft made a wise choice when they bought it.
     
  2. TECHWG

    TECHWG Guest

    Yes a manual scan those were my results
     
  3. duke1959

    duke1959 Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,238
    I was wondering if anyone who has been familiar with Grisoft in the past, thinks AVG 7.5 Antivirus has definitely improved? I realize without it being tested we don't know for sure, but does anyone think we should trust the claims by Grisoft that it has improved, and now has better heuristics?
     
  4. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    yes, it improved. how much we will see next year.
     
  5. jlo

    jlo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Posts:
    475
    Location:
    UK
    I have noticed by watching virus submissions through Jotti's scanner and when I have submitted stuff myself that very often AVG is now detecting with generic signitures.

    Seems to be an improvment.

    Cheers

    Jlo
     
  6. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
    All I can say is that its operation on my two computers has been flawless, and that it proactively detected malcious code on my system on several occasions. They say trust is something that has to be earned - well, I trust them.
     
  7. Big Apple

    Big Apple Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Posts:
    724
    Are you talking about the Pro or the Free version?
     
  8. Pinga

    Pinga Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Posts:
    1,420
    Location:
    Europe
    The latter. They're very, very similar.
     
  9. Macaroni

    Macaroni Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Posts:
    6
    I always like AVG free, until around 2 years ago there was a security hole. Then I realised it wasn't good enough. That was when I moved to Avira Antivir free.
    I use AVG as an on access scanner and am happy with that, and it has detected and helped at times.
     
  10. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    The Anti-Malware edition has better detection rates than the Free or Pro versions....
     
  11. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    Even better if you will test AVG Anti-Malware 7.5 as well, just to see how former Ewido is increasing the detection rate of AVG av:s! :)

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  12. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    IBK is already using AVG Anti-Malware for AV-comparatives tests (since the PUP test). :)
     
  13. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    OK! Thanks. :)

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
  14. QBgreen

    QBgreen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Posts:
    627
    Location:
    Queens County, NY
    Very curious to see the upcoming AV-Comparative numbers for AVGAM. Took a look at it, and while the interface didn't knock my socks off, the detection rates just might.
     
  15. Big Apple

    Big Apple Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Posts:
    724
    So, you are saying, that the Avg Internet Security Suite has different detection rates than even the Pro version? Is the suite using a different engine and signatures? I find that kind of hard to believe, but like to know for sure!
     
  16. QBgreen

    QBgreen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Posts:
    627
    Location:
    Queens County, NY
    No, what he's saying is that with the better heuristics and overall detection abilities of the 7.5 engine combined with the infusion of AVG Anti-Spyware (or ewido, if you will) that AVG Anti-Malware (not ISS) will have better detection abilities than its siblings.
     
  17. Big Apple

    Big Apple Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Posts:
    724
    Does anyone know if a license for the Avg IS suite can be used for the Avg Malware program?
     
  18. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    AVG Internet Security includes the ewido AntiSpyware component and thus effectively offers the same protection as AVG Anti-Malware. Therefore, you do not need to change from AVG Internet Security to AVG Anti-Malware, as both of these products offer the very same protection.

    AVG Free and Pro do not have this extra engine, and thus suffer from reduced detection rates of trojans, adware, spyware, and to some extent rootkits.
     
  19. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    i agree, turn off the firewall, and its the same i think.

    although, dont quote me on this as i aint 100% sure.
     
  20. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    AVG Internet Security = AVG Anti-Malware + AntiSpam + Firewall :)
     
  21. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    ok that makes sense i suppose,

    avg's antispam is the best ive ever seen though, caught 90% easily.

    at least if IBK tested avg malware 7.5, it should score well, infact im sure it will. :D
     
  22. bugsy_pal

    bugsy_pal Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Posts:
    76
    I don't use AVG AV myself, but at work this week we had a 0-day trojan infection that has caused havoc, and the corporate AV (eTrust) did nothing to stop it. As an interim measure, they have rolled out AVG Free on infected machines to keep the spread in check. It wasn't able to eliminate the Trojan entirely from the work network, but it has stopped it from doinf further damage on infected PCs. I think we are still waiting on a final solution.

    So i would have to say that AVG are doing well - I don't think our IT guys could come up with any other free product that could recognise this new virus at the time.
     
  23. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    if etrust were being used ... then im sure the damage has already been done, avg will stop as much as it can.

    try dr.web cure it /available in my signature) you dont have to install it and it scans and removes for free with the latest signature files, this can be used with another av installed without confliction
     
  24. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    eTrust is a terrible AV. never use it you are better off with almost anything.
     
  25. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I wonder if Avast or Avira AntiVir could detect the trojan you were talknig about. They are also free products.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.